Laserfiche WebLink
Parsons Engineering Science, Inc <br /> mg/kg), SB$-25 (960 mg/kg) and SBS-30 (160 mg/kg)] contained TPH-D at levels in excess <br /> of 100 mg/kg <br /> Re ulator Evaluation of Site Groundwater Contamination <br /> g Y <br /> Both PHS-EHD and the RWQCB staff generally utilize drinking water standards as <br /> guidelines for assessment of groundwater remediation standards Numerical drinking water <br /> quality standards (primarily Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLS)] are published for the <br /> BTEX compounds detected and are listed in Table 3 However, no MCLs have been <br /> published for TPH-D The only contaminant detected at a concentration in excess of its MCL <br /> was benzene However, benzene was only detected in one sample (MW-3, June 1993) and <br /> the reported concentration (0 7 ug/L) only slightly exceeded the MCL (0 5 ug/L) No other <br /> BTEX compound has ever been detected in excess of its MCL either before or after June <br /> 1993 <br /> Although relatively high levels of TPH-D have been left in place in subsurface soils with <br /> w the potential to adversely impact groundwater in the vicinity of the former UFST, they do <br /> not appear to have done so For 10 of the 17 groundwater sampling events, TPH-D was not <br /> detected in all wells sampled This includes the most recent event (September 1996) With <br /> the exception of the concentrations of TPH-D detected in MW-3 and MW-2 in June 1996 <br /> (which are probably anomalous), concentrations of TPH-D, when detected, have been in the <br /> vicinity of or below 100 pa/1 It is likely that remaining residual soil contamination is <br /> isolated in small pockets and will either attenuate before reaching groundwater or as soon as <br /> it encounters groundwater Thus, based on historical data, TPH-D in soil does not appear to <br /> impact groundwater quality beneath or downgradient of the site <br /> Due to the fact that gasoline was never used at the terminal and TPH-G was not detected <br /> in the soil and groundwater samples analyzed for TPH-G, it is not a contaminant of concern <br /> Since TPH-G is not a contaminant of concern at the site, the additives to gasoline (i e methyl <br /> tertiary butyl ether, 1,2-dtchloroethane, tetraethyl lead) should also be of no concern at the <br /> site <br /> Groundwater seepage probably occurs along Mormon Slough, located approximately <br /> 1,300 feet downgradient of the Greyhound site Therefore, analytical results from <br /> groundwater at the Greyhound site should be interpreted based on potential impacts of <br /> contaminated groundwater on WQOs for surface water at Mormon Slough These WQOs <br /> include the WRCB's policy of non-degradation of existing water quality or the beneficial <br /> uses of that water body <br /> In view of the lack of beneficial uses of groundwater at the site and distance of the UFST <br /> release to Mormon Slough, there is a low potential for impending risk to human health and <br /> the environment resulting from groundwater contaminated by the former UFST Both soil <br /> and groundwater samples recently collected from downgradient well MW-4 support this <br /> conclusion <br /> PARESSYROI VOLIR 1WP1727607 80969127607803 WW6 11 <br />