My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
139
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544169
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 9:58:03 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 2:29:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0544169
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006437
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON STATION #90557*** (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
139
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CENTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13730012
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
139 S CENTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> receptors. The work plan also described Chevron's subsequent plans to evaluate the necessity of remedial <br /> feasibility studies upon its review of the data collected during work plan implementation. <br /> The work plan addendum(10/17/96) submitted by Pacific proposed relocating the originally proposed <br /> monitoring well such that downgradient contaminant plume definition would be accomplished. The work <br /> plan addendum also proposed a soil boring that would obtain soil samples for the purpose of better <br /> characterizing exposure pathways beneath the subject site. The work plan addendum described the scope <br /> of work as being part of a phased, cost-effective approach toward corrective action that is based on actual <br /> risk. The work plan addendum again,emphasized that Chevron would evaluate the feasibility of remedial <br /> alternatives as soon as the associated risks were characterized and the appropriate level of remedial action <br /> was determined. <br /> Submit a map indicating proposed well/boring locations,work plan amendment including feasibility <br /> study,and permit applications/fees and encroachment permits. <br /> Chevron's consultant,Pacific Environmental Group,Inc.,will submit a revised site map to your agency <br /> on April 28, 1997. The revised map will indicate the new locations of the proposed monitoring well and <br /> soil boring. On that day Pacific will also submit the necessary well/boring permit applications and <br /> associated fees. The encroachment permit application for the proposed monitoring well is still being <br /> reviewed by Caltrans. A copy of this permit will be submitted to your agency as soon as it is received. The <br /> City of Stockton has deferred all encroachment/permitting issues relating to the proposed monitoring well <br /> to Caltrans. However, the City of Stockton will be notified of the proposed well location and of the <br /> planned drilling schedule. <br /> As discussed above, Chevron feels that it would be premature at this time to perform any feasibility testing <br /> of remedial alternatives. As such, there are no plans to amend the existing work plan to include remedial <br /> alternative feasibility testing. However, Chevron is committed to performing a feasibility evaluation of <br /> remedial alternatives. As results from the proposed scope of work are known and associated risks are <br /> characterized, a corrective action plan will be developed which will include a feasibility study of <br /> appropriate remedial alternatives. <br /> Chevron requests for groundwater monitoring program changes are denied. <br /> Prior to making the recommendation to modify the groundwater monitoring program at the subject site, <br /> Chevron reviewed the historic site data to answer the following questions.Have all contaminants of <br /> concern been identified?Has the extent of contamination in groundwater been adequately defined?Does <br /> the groundwater investigation data provide enough information to determine the most cost-effective plan <br /> of remedial action?The answers to these questions are provided below. <br /> Knowledge about the primary source of contamination combined with seven years of soil and groundwater <br /> investigation at the subject site have provided Chevron a thorough understanding about the contaminants <br /> of concern. <br /> The adequacy of groundwater contaminant plume definition at the subject site should be evaluated in <br /> terms of understanding the transport and migrational tendencies of the contaminant with respect to <br /> potential receptor locations and health risk. This comes down to knowing the direction,velocity,and <br /> distance the contaminant will migrate and knowing where any potential receptors are. The direction of <br /> groundwater(contaminant)flow at the subject site has been toward the southeast. This flow direction has <br /> been consistent throughout six hydrologic cycles. As such, the migrational direction of the contaminant <br /> plume is well understood by Chevron. Considering the soil types within the water bearing zone beneath <br /> the subject site, it would be reasonable to estimate a groundwater flow velocity of no more than three feet <br /> per year. However at this time, Chevron has little knowledge about the location of sensitive receptors in <br /> the vicinity of the subject site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.