My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
139
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544169
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 9:41:52 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 2:39:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0544169
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006437
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON STATION #90557*** (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
139
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CENTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13730012
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
139 S CENTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AECOM Ms.Victoria L.McCartney <br /> May 29,2013 <br /> 1 <br /> Page 2 <br /> SUMMARY OF HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATIONS AT DEPTH(-50 fbg) <br /> Screen/Sample TPHg Benzene Analytical <br /> Well ID Depth(fbg)' Direction** (Ng/I)*** (Ng/I)*** Trend <br /> MW-15D 46-51 -- 19,000 650 variable <br /> MW-7 32-52 Southeast/downgradient 170 <0.5 decreasing <br /> MW-8 22-42 Southeast/downgradient <50 <0.5 -- <br /> MW-5 35-60 Southeast/downgradient <50 <0.5 -- <br /> CPT-8 47-50 East/crossgradient 1,100 <0.5 -- <br /> MW-2 35-60 East/crossgradient <50 <0.5 -- <br /> MW-6 35-60 West/crossgradient <50 <0.5 - <br /> *Approximate depths <br /> **Direction relative to monitoring well MW-15D <br /> ***Most recent data from HFA's site assessment report dated January 24,2012; and low-threat closure <br /> request report dated March 26, 2013 <br /> SJCEHD COMMENT.Provide the technical justification for the use of the geometric mean, rather than the <br /> arithmetic mean, when calculating the mass estimates of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPHg) <br /> in soil, and total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel(TPHd)in groundwater. <br /> RESPONSE: The usage of geometric mean for calculating mass estimates of TPHg in soil and TPHd in <br /> groundwater provides a more conservative value for the concentrations which are log normally <br /> distributed. Usage of the arithmetic mean would oversimplify the distribution of the concentrations <br /> throughout the plume resulting in a lower residual mass calculation. <br /> SJCEHD COMMENT:Also clarify why the height(h) was multiplied by 0.8 to get a volume of <br /> 7,700,000 cubic feet when calculating the TPHd mass in groundwater. <br /> RESPONSE: For calculating the TPHd mass in groundwater, the formula used is "volume= r1 x r2 x 0.8 x <br /> h", where"h" is defined as vertical depth and is not changed. Because the plume is modeled as an <br /> ellipse, it is assumed that the plume is 80% of the volume of the water within the rectangular prism r1 x r2 <br /> x h. Therefore, the volume of the plume within the rectangle is(r1 x r2 x h) x 0.8 or 80% of r1 x r2 x h. <br /> Although it is likely that the volume is still an overestimate, the resulting volume is more representative of <br /> a dissolved-phase hydrocarbon plume. <br /> 60289045 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.