Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING AND REPORTINGGRAM NO.R5-2003-XXXX . 3 <br /> SPX CORPORATION,MARLEY COING TOWER COMPANY <br /> IN SITU GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION PILOT STUDY,SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> TENTATIVE <br /> REPORTING <br /> Iii reporting monitoring data, the Discharger shall arrange the data in tabular form so that the date, <br /> sample type (e.g., influent, effluent, groundwater, etc.), and reported analytical result for each sample <br /> are readily discernible. The data shall be summarized in such a manner to clearly illustrate compliance <br /> with waste discharge requirements and spatial or temporal trends, as applicable. The results of any <br /> monitoring done more frequently than required at the locations specified in the Monitoring and <br /> Reporting Program shall also be reported to the Regional Board. <br /> As required by the California Business and Professions Code Sections 6735, 7835, and 7835.1, all <br /> Reports shall be prepared under the direct supervision of a Registered Engineer or Geologist and signed <br /> by the registered professional. <br /> A. Monitoring Reports <br /> Phase 1 Pilot Study <br /> 40 Day Report <br /> Within 40 days after start of injection of Phase 1 pilot study, the Discharger shall submit a report <br /> summarizing the results of the pilot test, including an assessment of calcium polysulfide/ethanol <br /> injection, and recommendations for continuing with the proposed Phase 2 pilot study. <br /> At a minimum, the report shall include: <br /> 1. A narrative description of all preparatory, monitoring, sampling, and analytical <br /> testing activities for the groundwater monitoring. The narrative shall be sufficiently <br /> detailed to verify compliance with the WDR, the attached MRP, and the Standard <br /> Provisions and Reporting Requirements. The narrative shall be supported by <br /> documenting flow rates, and total volume of calcium polysulfnde and ethanol injected, <br /> and parameters measured. <br /> 2. An assessment of calcium polysulfide and ethanol discharge to the aquifer, and <br /> results of all sampling; <br /> 3. Copies of all laboratory analytical report(s); <br /> 4. A calibration log verifying weekly calibration of any field monitoring instruments <br /> (e.g., pH, dissolved oxygen meter, etc)used to obtain data; <br /> 5. An evaluation of the changes in aquifer geochemistry including the extent of hexavalent <br /> chromium reduction, assessment of changes in mobility of other metals including <br /> arsenic, and changes in sulfate. <br /> 6. An analysis of whether the injected calcium polysulfide/ethanol and any breakdown or <br /> byproducts is being captured by the extraction system or is continuing to spread; <br />