|
Agenda -5- 13/14 March 2003
<br /> 28. The Regional Board may meet in dosed session to consider personnel matters [Authority: Government Code
<br /> Section 11126(a)];to discuss matters in litigation,including discussion of initiated litigation, significant
<br /> exposure to litigation, or decisions to initiate litigation [Authority: Government Code Section 11126(e)];or to
<br /> deliberate on a decision to be reached based upon evidence introduced in a hearing [Authority: Government
<br /> Code Section 11126(c)(3)]. Items that may be discussed are:
<br /> 1. CVRWQCB, et at v.Aerojet-Genera!Corp.,et al,Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct.No. 286073,consolidated with
<br /> Nos. 288302 and 291981; CVRWQCB, et al. v.Aerojet-General Corp., or al., USDC (EDCal) No. CIV-S-86-
<br /> 0064-EJG (consolidated with U.S. v.Aerojet-General Corp., et al., USDC (EDCal) No. CIV-S-86-0063-EJG.
<br /> 2. American States Water Co., et al., v. CVRWQCB, et al.,Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 99AS05947.
<br /> 3. Sacramento Regional Co. Sanitation Dist. v. SWRCB, et al., Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 98CS01702.
<br /> 4. State of Calif., CVRWQCB, et al. v.Iron Mountain Mines, Inc., et al,USDC (EDCal) No. CIV-S-91-1167-
<br /> DFL-PAN and U.S. v. Iron Mountain Mines,Inc., et al., USDC (EDCal) No. S-91-0768 DFL/JFM.
<br /> 5. State of Calif. ex rel CIWMB, et al. v.Edward j. Filbin, et al. (Westley Tire Fire).
<br /> 6. San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc., et al. v. SWRCB, et al.,Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 99CS02722. (Toxic Hot
<br /> Spots)
<br /> 7. Coalition for Alternatives to Kiefer Landfill x SWRCB, et al., Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 01CS00728.
<br /> 8. CVRWQCB v.A Greener Globe Corp., et al.,Placer Co. Sup. Ct. No. SCV11383.
<br /> 9. CVRWQCB v. Sonora Mining Corp., et al.,Tuolumne Co. Sup. Ct. No. CV 486 Qamestown Mine).
<br /> 10. Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc. v. CVRWQCB, Sierra Co. Sup. Ct. No. 5511.
<br /> 11. City ofBrentwood v. CVRWQCB, Contra Costa Co. Sup. Ct.No. 2-0160.
<br /> 12. State of Calif., City of Lodi v.M&P Investments, et al.,USDC (EDCal) No. CN S-00-2441 FCD.
<br /> 13. R.Lawson Enterprises dba Wildrose Vineyards, et al., v. CVRWQCB,San Joaquin Co. Sup. Ct. No. CV
<br /> 017290.
<br /> 14. City ofMerced, et al., v.R.A.Fields, CVRWQCB, U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Cir.) D.C. No. CV-F 92-
<br /> 5627 (REC/DLB) EDCal; City ofMerced, et al., v.R.A. Fields, et al., USDC (EDCal) No. CV-F 92-5627
<br /> RFC/DLB.
<br /> 15. National Park Service,EI Portal WWTF,Administrative Civil Liability Order No. 5-01-031.
<br /> 16. Petitions ofMeridian Beartrack Co., et al.,SWRCB/OCC Files A-1369,A-1469.
<br /> 17. Petition of Sacramento Co. for Review of WDRs Order No. 5-01-256, Sacramento Co.Boys Ranch,
<br /> SWRCB/OCC File A-1431.
<br /> 18. Petition of City of Stockton for Review ofWDRs OrderNo. R5-2002-0083 andC&D Order No. R5-2002-
<br /> 0084 for Stockton Regional Wastewater Control Facility,SWRCB/OCC A-1483. (NPDES permit)
<br /> 19. Petitions of(1) City of Stockton and Co. of Sanjoaquin and(2)DeltaKeeper, et al.,for Review of WDRs
<br /> Order No.R5-2002-0181,SWRCB/OCC Files A-1524 and A-1524(a). (Storm water permit)
<br /> 20. Petition of Co. of Sacramento and Cities of Sacramento, Galt, Folsom and Elk Grove for Review of
<br /> WDRs Order No. R5-2002-0206, SWRCB/OCC File A-1538. (Storm water permit)
<br /> 21. Petitions of(1)DeltaKeeper;San Francisco BayKeepe;Natural Resources Defense Council; California
<br /> Public Interest Research Group; The Ocean Conservancy; California Sportiishing Protection Alliance
<br /> l and(2)Agricultural Water Quality Coalition, for Review of the Agricultural Return Flow Waiver,
<br /> SWRCB/OCC Files A-1536(a) and A-1536.
<br /> 22. Deltakeeper, et al v. CVRWQCB,Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 03CS00032 (Ag Waiver CEQA lawsuit).
<br /> 23. Petition of the Association ofInitated Residents;Communities for Land,Air& Water;DeltaKeeper,for
<br /> Review of the ConftnedAnimal Facility Waiver,SWRCB/OCC File A-1537.
<br /> 24. Association oflrritated Residents, et al v. CVRWQCB,Sacramento Co. Sup. Ct. No. 03CS00064. (Confined
<br /> Animal Facilities CEQA lawsuit)
<br /> i
<br />
|