My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS (3)
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541087
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2019 8:05:11 PM
Creation date
2/22/2019 3:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
RECORD_ID
PR0541087
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0023524
FACILITY_NAME
SPX MARLEY COOLING FACILITY
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14331007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
403
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary of Findings: <br /> All samples were analyzed according to the accompanying chains of custody. All analytical holding times <br /> were met. <br /> QC data were reviewed for laboratory and instrument precision and accuracy from LCS/LCSD recoveries <br /> and relative percent differences (RPDs) and MS/MSD sample recoveries and RPDs. All quality control <br /> elements were found to be within acceptable limits with the following exception: <br /> • The MS/MSD percent recoveries and RPDs associated with metals analysis of MW-4 were not <br /> meaningful for chromium because the concentration of chromium in the parent sample was <br /> greater than four times the concentration used for the spike. Therefore, the criteria were not <br /> evaluated. <br /> Field sampling precision was also evaluated by using the calculated RPD between results reported for the <br /> field duplicate pairs, which are listed above. All RPD results were found to be within the acceptable limits <br /> for precision for all methods with the following exception: <br /> • The field duplicate pair MW-102 and MW-102 Duplicate had an RPD that was greater than the <br /> control limit for arsenic; the result was qualified as estimated (J) in the parent sample. <br /> No target analytes were detected in any method blank or field QC samples with the following exception: <br /> • Equipment Rinse and Field Blank, associated with the analysis of four samples had TOC <br /> detected at 1.0 mg/L and 0.9 mg/L, respectively. All four samples had TOC detected at <br /> concentrations greater than the reporting limit, but less than five times the blank result, and were <br /> qualified as estimated (J). <br /> All data submitted for this project are of known and acceptable quality as qualified, based on laboratory- <br /> established control limits and the data quality objectives. These data are considered acceptable for their <br /> intended purposes. <br /> Summary of Qualified Data: <br /> Sample Name Laboratory ID Sample Date Parameter Result Unit Qualifier <br /> MW-447D X1 H2209-09 08/22/11 TOC 1.0 m /L J <br /> MW-447S X1 H2209-10 08/22/11 TOC 1.1 m /L J <br /> MW-448S X1 H2209-11 08/22/11 TOC 1.7 mg/L J <br /> MW-448D X1 H2209-12 08/22/11 TOC 1.0 m /L J <br /> MW-102 X1 H2209-14 08/22/11 Arsenic 0.002 mg/L J <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.