Laserfiche WebLink
" Less than <br /> Potentially.- Significant Less-than- <br /> Significant w/Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CHECKLIST <br /> i <br /> 1. AESTHETICS - Would the project: <br /> i <br /> a'. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> i <br /> b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, <br /> but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> buildings along a scenic highway? <br /> c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> quality of the site and its surroundings? <br /> d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? <br /> Supporting Documentation/References Cited: <br /> 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - In determining whether <br /> impacts on agricultural resources are significant <br /> environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the <br /> California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site <br /> Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the <br /> California Department of Conservation. Would the project: <br /> a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> Statewide Importance(Farmland), as shown on the maps <br /> prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring <br /> Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- <br /> Agricultural use? <br /> b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or conflict ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> with a Williamson Act contract? <br /> c. Involve other changes in the existing environment that, ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> due to their location or nature, could result in conversion <br /> of Farmland to non-agricultural use? <br /> Supporting Documentation/References Cited: <br /> 3. AIR QUALITY—When available,the significance criteria <br /> established by the applicable air quality management or <br /> air pollution control district may be relied upon to make <br /> the following determinations. Would the project: <br /> a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> Air quality plan? <br /> b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br /> to an existing or projected air quality violation? <br /> c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br /> criteria pollutant for which the project region is a non- <br /> attainment area for an applicable federal or state ambient <br /> air quality standard (including releasing emissions that <br /> exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? <br /> 6 <br />