ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011671 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE CHECKLIST(Completed by City Stafn This checklist shall be completed, and/or independently reviewed and authorized, by the City of Stockton Community Development Department/Planning Division pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines,Section 15063 The following questions are intended to provide a brief environmental evaluation of the proposed project in order to identify I any potentially significant adverse environmental impacts which may be caused by the project or which may affect the project site For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that any feasible mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study,which have been agreed to pursuant to a"Mitigation Agreement"with the City of Stockton, will be incorporated into the project ' In the first assessment category, "Potentially Significant," a "No" response indicates that the project (with mitigation measures, if applicable) will not have, or be subject to any significant effects on the environment A "Yes" response ' indicates that the project may/will have a significant adverse effect,either directly or indirectly,even if partially mitigated In the second category, "Mitigation Incorporated" a "Yes" response indicates that the project will fully or partially mitigate any adverse effects by incorporating proposed and/or required mitigation measures A "No" response indicates that ' mitigation measures have not been agreed to,are infeasible,or are not necessary A narrative discussion of all"Yes"responses and any clarifications to "No"responses and/or the scope of work for an EIR,if required, shall be provided in the section following this checklist (Section D- "Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures and/or EIR Scope of Work") ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Potentially Mitigation Significant Iiicorporated Yes No Yes No I EARTH Will the proposal result in a Unstable earth conditions in geologic substructures b Disruptions,displacements,compaction,or over covering of the soil9 ,/ V/ c Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ' d The destruction,covering,or modification or any unique geologic or physical features9 e Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,either on or off the site9 ,/ f Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands,or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay,inlet or lake'? g Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,mud slides,ground failure,or similar hazards? Z AIR Will the proposal result m a Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air(local short-term and/or V/ regional long-term.impacts)9 ' b The creation of objectionable odors9 c Violation of any ambient air quality standard,substantial contribution to an existing or projected air quality violation,or exposure of sensitive receptors to ' substantial pollutant concentrations? 3 WATER Will the proposal result in, a Changes in currents,or the course of direction of water movements, in either r/ marine or fresh water? b Changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ?L c Alterations to the course or flow of floodwater? ' EX]5 iH DOC W25/97 9