My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS - GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND LIMITED SOIL SAMPLING
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
317
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516724
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS - GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND LIMITED SOIL SAMPLING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2019 3:12:32 PM
Creation date
2/25/2019 1:16:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
- GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AND LIMITED SOIL SAMPLING
RECORD_ID
PR0516724
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0012756
FACILITY_NAME
ELKS LODGE PROPERTY
STREET_NUMBER
317
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CENTER
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13731010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
317 S CENTER
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' in KLEINFELDER <br /> ' extend to at least 5-feet. Kleinfelder estimates that approximately 1,150 cubic yards of soil are <br /> affected with lead contamination. Please see the attached site map for details. <br /> Kleinfelder also drilled and installed three monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3) on the site. <br /> Groundwater elevations ranged from -11.43 feet above msl to -12.22 feet msl. The depth to water <br /> ' was approximately 22 to 24 feet bgs. The groundwater flow direction was calculated to be <br /> towards to the east/southeast, with an overall gradient of 0.001 feet/foot. MW-1 is the <br /> downgradient well during this sampling event and MW-2 and MW-3 were the upgradient wells <br /> during this sampling event. <br /> ' Based on the analytical result, the baseline groundwater quality at the site can be characterized as <br /> having exceedences over the applicable Water Quality Goals (WQGs) for the metal selenium in <br /> one groundwater sample and the VOC methylene chloride in each of the three groundwater <br /> ' samples. <br /> The WQG for selenium is 0.05 mg/l and is expressed as a Primary Maximum Contaminant Level <br /> ' (PMCL). Selenium detected in the water sample collected from MW-2 had a concentration of <br /> 0.056 mg/l slightly above the PMCL for selenium. Selenium was not detected at or above the <br /> laboratory reporting limit for MW-1 or MW-3 which might suggest an off-site source upgradient <br /> ' to MW-2 or a high background concentration. Other metals detected in the groundwater samples <br /> included barium, chromium, vanadium, and zinc. The detected concentrations of these metals <br /> were below the respective WQGs. <br /> ' The WQG for methylene chloride is 5 ug/1 and is also a PMCL. The detected concentrations of <br /> methylene chloride in each of the three water samples were 7.1 ug/l (MW-1), 33 ug/l (MW-2), 15 <br /> ' ug/l (MW-3). The concentrations of methylene chloride are shown to be higher in the upgradient <br /> water samples versus the downgradient sample suggesting an off-site source. Methylene chloride <br /> ' can be characterized as being widely used as an industrial solvent and as a paint stripper, and was <br /> also used in certain aerosol and pesticide products and in the manufacture of photographic film. <br /> Other VOCs detected included bromochloromethane (MW-2 only) with a concentration of 3.1 <br /> ug/l; and bromomethane (each well) with concentrations of 2.8 ug/l (MW-1), 2.3 ug/I (MW-2), <br /> and 2.7 ug/l (MW-3). The WQG for bromochloromethane is expressed as a USEPA Suggested <br /> No Adverse Response Level (SNARL) for toxicity other than cancer risk of 90 ug/1. The WQG <br /> for bromomethane is also expressed as a SNARL with a level of 10 ug/1 (Draft level at this time <br /> form Cal EPA) and 9.8 ug/l as a USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Reference <br /> ' Dose as a Drinking Water Level (assuming 70 kg body weight, 2 liters per day water <br /> consumption, and 20% relative source contribution from drinking water). <br /> ' TPH-d and TPH-mo were detected only in the MW-1 sample (downgradient). The concentrations <br /> detected were 230 ug/l and 280 ug/l respectfully. The absence of either constituent noted in the <br /> soil samples collected from the 15' and 25' intervals of the MW-1 boring and the non-detectable <br /> ' concentrations noted from the soil boring samples and groundwater collected from MW-2 and <br /> MW-3 suggests the possibility of an on-site source upgradient of MW-1. <br /> 42162.1301 /ST04R854 Page 20 of 22 <br /> Copyright 2004,Kleinfelder,Inc. July 1,2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.