My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CENTER
>
1717
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2019 2:19:24 PM
Creation date
2/27/2019 10:47:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544190
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004950
FACILITY_NAME
CENTER STREET PARTS
STREET_NUMBER
1717
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
CENTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16507228
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1717 S CENTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
398
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> Michael J. Infurna Jr. <br /> Senior REHS San Joaquin County <br /> Site Mitigation Unit IV / LOP Public Health Services <br /> Fifth Floor Environmental <br /> Desk: (209) 468-3454 304 Stockton,Weber 0 <br /> FAX: (209) 468-3433 <br /> F6MD <br /> From: MICHAEL INFURNA, REHS <br /> To: Mark Milward Company: Philip Env <br /> Date: October 16, 2001 Fax #: (618) 281-5120 <br /> Pages: ( 2 ) including this face sheet <br /> Re: work plan for 1717 Center St, Stockton "Earthgrains" <br /> • Comments: <br /> 1-check out page 5 of your work plan. Isn't "PH-6" detailed in paragraph one a <br /> typo? Since site doesn't have a "PH-3" shouldn't that paragraph say <br /> ...probeholes (PH-3 through PH-5.? "PH-6" is also detailed in paragraph 4. <br /> 2-also, I'm concerned that "MW-4's" screened interval won't match existing <br /> monitoring wells intervals and may be constructed only through the "clayey <br /> silts" bore logs for "PH-1" and "PH-2" indicate is present 25' to 50' bgs. With <br /> DTW historically at this site at only 22' to 25' bgs, your proposal, "well screen, <br /> set 10 feet below the water table and 5 feet above", may not accurately <br /> represent the same lithology as the other wells and may be set in a non- <br /> permeable zone. That's why I want you to do `continuous coring' at depths <br /> corresponding to screened interval proposals to see if there's some sand <br /> stringer in between the 5 foot data we have, or need to go to the `sands' at 50'. <br /> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information in this facsimile is legally privileged and confidential information intended <br /> only for the use of the addressee listed on this cover sheet if the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the <br /> employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination,distribution or <br /> copying of this telecopy is stdctly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile in error,please immediately notify us by telephone <br /> at the number listed on this cover sheet and retum the original message to us at the above address via United States Postal <br /> Service. We will reimburse your costs in notifying us and returning the message to us. Thank You <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.