Laserfiche WebLink
........ . .... <br /> San Joaquin CountyQ�qc OMCTOR <br /> P Donna Horan,REMS <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> M <br /> Stockton, California 95202-3029 Robert MPROGRAMcClellon,COOMREHS Rs <br /> REHS <br /> Jeff Carruesoo,REHS.R01 <br /> Website:WWW-SJ90V-0 Kaaey Foley,REHS <br /> rgVohd Unda Turkatte.REHS <br /> Phone: (209)468-3420 <br /> Fax: (209)464-0136 <br /> January 18,2011 <br /> Mr.John Russell, PG, Fund Manager <br /> State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Division of Financial Assistance <br /> 1001 1 Street <br /> Sacramento, CA 96814 <br /> SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON CLEANUP FUND SITE CLOSURE RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Dear Mr. Russell: <br /> On 24 December 2010, the San Joaquin County Environmenlal Heatth Department (EHD) <br /> received your letter requesting comments on the closure of 18 sites in the EHD Local Oversight <br /> Program (LOP) for which your office, the State Water Resources Control Board Cleanup Fund <br /> (CU r),has made closure consideration r000rnmendation. Of the 18 sites: <br /> • Six sites are In the final closure process. An EMD decision to close the sites was made <br /> with no additional data, analysis or technical justifications required (Claim Nos. 13651, <br /> 13879, 14118, 15890, 17042 and 16496). Depending on the consultants timing for <br /> destroying monitoring wells .and submitting certification of proper disposal Of <br /> investigation-derived wasted (113W), the EHD anticipates issuing case closure letters <br /> within 90 days; <br /> Nine sites have No Further Action Reports (NFAR) that are undergoing EHD review, <br /> human health risk assessments, or data evaluation. No additional site data acquisition <br /> anticipated except for soil gas data in a few cases (Claim Nos. 4423, 8431, 889, 1978, <br /> 11776, 13850, 17179, 1026 and 18139); <br /> Two require some additional work, such as data mkodorl, monitoring, delineation, <br /> remediation, or confirmation data(Claim Nos. 8753 and 14558);and <br /> • One site (Claim No. 14353) has been referred to the Central Valley Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board(CVRWQCB). <br /> Your kaw indicates that If the EHD agrees that.a site should be closed, a closure letter will be <br /> Issued within 90 days. The EHD agrees that the first six sites noted above will fit this criteria. <br /> While not disagreeing with you on the rwd nine sites, experience indicates that more than go <br /> days will be required to complete the closure process. EHD comments an each of the 18 sites, <br /> In the order given, are shown below. <br /> Comments on CUF site cbsure Reconvrandadons 011 1.doc <br />