Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br /> Mr Michael Infurna Jr Senior REHS <br /> October 11, 2002 <br /> The property east of the site, across South Center Street at 1725 E1 Dorado Street, <br /> is a business currently operated as Glass Replacement and Supplies This property <br /> is situated on a traffic island between South Center and El Dorado Streets <br /> Historic information indicates that this property was formerly operated as a retail <br /> gasoline station until about 1986 <br /> UST Related Activities <br /> A 1,000-gallon gasoline UST located beneath the sidewalk along South Center <br /> Street, an associated fuel dispenser located within the property building, and the <br /> portion of product piping from the UST to the building were removed in <br /> December 1990 The remaining product piping, from the edge of the building to <br /> the former dispenser, was properly abandoned on April 17, 1998 <br /> On April 16, 1998, PSC drove two 1-inch diameter Geoprobe-type probeholes <br /> beneath the former UST to collect soil and groundwater samples for laboratory <br /> analysis Analytical results, summarized in PSC's June 2, 1998 Preliminary <br /> Subsurface Site Investigation Results and Product Piping Abandonment <br /> Completion report, indicated potential benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and <br /> xylenes (BTEX) impact to subsurface soil and groundwater Soil and groundwater <br /> samples collected at this time did not contain detectable oxygenate compounds <br /> In July 1999, Ground Zero Analysts, Inc (GZA) of Escalon, California, <br /> performed a subsequent subsurface investigation GZA drilled three soil borings, <br /> completed them as groundwater monitoring wells (labeled MW-1 through <br /> MW-3), and collected soil and groundwater samples for laboratory analysts <br /> GZA's investigation, summarized in their July 28, 1999 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Well Installation Report, detected BTEX and total petroleum hydrocarbon as <br /> gasoline (TPHg) impact to soil and groundwater samples collected at the MW-2 <br /> location (see Figure 2) Samples collected from MW-1 and MW-3, placed to <br /> upgradient positions relative to the former UST, did not contain detectable <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) directed that <br /> several quarters of groundwater monitoring be performed to assess evolving <br /> conditions Results of these monitoring events indicated that relatively high <br /> petroleum concentrations were measured in samples collected at the MW-2 <br /> location and non-detectable or relatively low concentrations at the upgradient <br /> locations <br />