Laserfiche WebLink
1.2 Previous UST Related Work <br /> A 1,000-gallon gasoline UST located beneath the sidewalk along the eastern <br /> portion of the Site, an associated fuel dispenser located within the Site <br /> building, and a portion of product piping from the UST to the building were <br /> removed in December 1990 Remaining product piping, from the edge of the <br /> building to the former dispenser,was properly abandoned on April 17, 1998 <br /> On April 16, 1998, Philip drove two 1-inch diameter Geoprobe probeholes <br /> (PH-1 and PH-2) beneath the former UST to collect soil and groundwater <br /> samples for laboratory analysis Analytical results, summarized in Philip's <br /> June 2, 1998 Preliminary Subsurface Site Investigation Results and Product <br /> Piping Abandonment Completion report, indicated that benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) compounds are present within subsurface <br /> soil and groundwater Soil and groundwater samples collected at that time did <br /> not contain detectable oxygenate compounds <br /> In July 1999, Ground Zero Analysis, Inc (GZA) of Escalon, California, <br /> performed a subsequent subsurface investigation GZA drilled three soil <br /> borings, completed them as groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through <br /> MW-3), and collected soil and groundwater samples for laboratory analysis <br /> GZA's investigation, summarized in their July 28, 1999 Groundwater <br /> Monitoring Well Installation Report, detected BTEX and total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon as gasoline (TPHg) impact in soil and groundwater samples <br /> collected at the MW-2 location(see Figure 2) Samples collected from MW-1 <br /> and MW-3, placed in hydraulically upgradient positions relative to the former <br /> UST, did not contain detectable petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> EHD directed that several quarters of groundwater monitoring be performed <br /> to assess evolving conditions Results of these monitoring events indicated <br /> that relatively high petroleum concentrations were measured in samples <br /> collected at the MW-2 location and non-detectable or relatively low <br /> concentrations at the upgradient locations <br /> EHD requested that additional investigation be performed to assess the extent <br /> of petroleum impact Philip submitted a September 24, 2001 Subsurface Site <br /> Investigation Workplan to EHD, which proposed an investigation approach <br /> EHD approved this workplan in a letter dated October 16, 2001 <br /> Philip performed the latest investigation in March of 2002 During this <br /> investigation, Philip drove 6 Geoprobe borings (PH-3 through PH-8), installed <br /> one groundwater monitoring well (MW-4), constructed one air sparging well <br /> (SP-1), one soil vapor extraction well (VW-1), and collected soil and <br /> groundwater samples for laboratory analysis Investigation findings, submitted <br /> to EHD in the May 14, 2002 March 2002 Subsurface Site Investigation report, <br /> included the following <br /> s <br /> Pilot Testing Work Plan <br /> 1717 South Center Street-Stockton Cahfomla <br /> Prepared by Philip Services Corp <br /> H\ENW2400I32\121362EG1Projem\SwkC"tlpdmtestptmdo July 23 2002 <br />