Laserfiche WebLink
' 23 June 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 00-0769 <br />' Page 4 of 13 <br /> bentonite transitional seal was installed between the filter pack intervals to minimize the potential <br />! for hydraulic influence from the other water bearing zones encountered in the monitoring well The <br /> bentonite seal was formed by pouring 318-inch, coated bentonite pellets into the annulus and <br />! allowing them to settle on the filter pack The bentonite pellets were allowed to hydrate for a <br /> minimum of one-half hour prior to the Installation of the next filter pack The second filter pack was <br /> added from the base of the next screen Interval to the upper portion of the screen Interval After <br />' installation of the filter pack, bentonite pellets were placed above the filter pack to the next screen <br /> interval This process was continued to above the last screen Interval and the remaining annular <br /> space was filled to near surface grade with a cement grout The grout mixture consisted of Type 1/11 <br /> portland neat cement with not more than 6 gallons of water per 94-pound sack of cement <br /> Each of the CMT monitoring wells (MW-4 through MW-9) was completed utilizing the same <br />! construction procedures for each individual well As-built well diagrams are included in Appendix C <br /> 3 14 Monitoring Well Development <br /> Utilizing a Watera inertial pump consisting of a dedicated 318-inch outer diameter, length-discrete <br /> polyethylene hose equipped with a ball-valve water tip , monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5 were <br /> developed on 10 September 2002, monitoring well MW-6 was developed on 14 October 2002, <br /> monitoring well MW-9 was developed on 15 October and monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 were <br /> developed on 16 October 2002 Purge water was extracted in each chamber by lowering and raising <br /> the 318-inch polyethylene hose through the water-charged screen section Temperature, pH and <br /> conductivity of purged ground water were measured using a Oakton water analyzer Ground water <br /> was purged from each monitoring well until ground water was visually sediment free and pH, <br /> conductivity and temperature had stabilized Field sheets and data are included in Appendix D <br /> Purged water was temporarily stored on-site in 55-gallon DOT-approved H-17 storage drums <br /> pending proper disposal <br />! 3 15 Well Head Survey <br />' On 21 November 2002, a Cdliforma state-licensed survey engineer from Baumbacb &Piazza, Inc <br /> surveyed the elevation of a reference point on the top of the casings of ground water monitoring <br /> wells MW-6 through MW-9 to the nearest 0 01-foot relative to City of StocktonBenchMark#179, <br />' surveyed at 25 86 feet above mean sea level (MSL) Due to accessibility issues, monitoring wells <br /> MW-4 and MW-5 could not be surveyed The results of the monitoring well survey are contained <br /> in Table 2 The surveying report is presented in Appendix E <br />! Yi <br /> • <br />! Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />