|
CPT Interpretations
<br /> Table 2 References
<br /> No Reference
<br /> 1 Robertson,P K and Campanella, R G, 1986,'Guidelines for Use,Interpretation and Application of the
<br /> CPT and CPTU',UBC,Sal Mechanics Series No 105 Civil Eng Dept,Vancouver,B C,
<br /> Canada
<br /> E2 Robertson P K,Campanella,R G Gillespie D and Greig,J,1986 'Use of Piezometer Cone Data",
<br /> i Proceedings of InSitu 86,ASCE Specialty Conference,Blacksburg Virginia,
<br /> 3 Robertson,P K and Campanella R G,1989,'Guidelines for Geotechnical Design Using CPT and
<br /> CPTU",UBC,Sal Mechanics Senes No 120,Civil Eng Dept. Vancouver B C,Canada
<br /> 4 Robertson P K. 1990,"Sal Classification Using the Cone Penetration Test",Canadian Geotechnical
<br /> Journal,Volume 27
<br /> 5 Robertson P K and Fear C E 1995,'L.iquefaction of Sands and its Evaluation",Keynote Lecture, First
<br /> International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Enginnenng Tokyo Japan
<br /> 6 i ConeTec Internal Report
<br /> 7 I Robertson, P K and Wnde,C E 1997 'Cyclic Liquefaction and its Evaluation Based on SPT and CPT',
<br /> NCEER Workshop Paper January 22,1997
<br /> I8 Wnde,C E and Robertson,P K, 1997 "Phase li Data Review Report(Massey and Kidd Sites,Fraser
<br /> River Delta)" Volume 1 -Data Report(June 1997) University of Alberta
<br /> 9 Plewes,N D,Dames,M P and Jeffenes,M G 1992 "CPT Based Screening Procedure for Evaluating
<br /> Liquefaction Susceptibility",45th Canadian Geotechnical Conference,Toronto,Ontario,
<br /> October 1992
<br /> I •
<br /> CONE ESC
<br /> E=
<br />
|