Laserfiche WebLink
S21 November 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 00-0769 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> from MW-1 at concentrations of40,000 gg/l(toluene),2,300 gg/l(ethylbenzene) and 12,000 <br /> gg/l (total xylenes) <br />' 1,2-DCA was detected in groundwater samples collected from MW-1,MW-2A and MW-2B <br /> at concentrations of 3,800 gg/l, 19 µg/1 and 200 µg/1, respectively EDB was not detected in <br /> any of the ground water samples collected during the September 2001 monitoring event <br /> 1 , <br /> Laboratory results of water samples analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons are summarized in <br />' Tables 2 and 3 The laboratory reports. for the quarterly monitoring event (MAI Lab IDs 78860 <br /> through 78863) QA/QC reports and chain-of-custody form are included in Appendix D <br /> S.D. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br />' The findings of the June and September 2001 site investigation events include the following <br /> • Contamination by TPH-g and BTEX constituents was encountered in ground water samples <br /> lie collected from four of the five on site monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-2A, MW-2B and <br /> MW-3A), a parked vehicle prevented sampling MW--3B Concentrations as high as 220,000 <br /> gg/l (TPH-g), 30,000 gg/l (benzene), 40,000 µg11 (toluene), 2,300 gg/1 (ethylbenzene) and <br />' 12,000 gg/1 (total xylenes) were detected <br /> 1,2-DCA was detected in ground water samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1, <br />' MW-2A and MW-2B at concentrations as high as 3,800 pg/1(MW-1) EDB was not detected <br /> in any of the ground water samples collected during the September 2001 monitoring event <br /> • Concentrations of contamination have remained relatively stable since ground water <br />' monitoring began in May 1998 <br /> + The horizontal and vertical extent of contamination related to the former UST has not yet <br />' been defined in soil or ground water I I ° r <br /> • Measured ground water elevation was approximately'13 4 feet and 14 4 feet below msl in <br />' the shallow screened wells (MW-1, MW-29 and MW-3B) during the June and September Y <br /> 2001 monitoring events, respectively Ground water was within the screened interval of <br /> monitoring wells MW-2B and MW-3B and was approximately 5 feet above the screened <br />' interval of MW-1 Ground water was approximately 0 10 feet and 0 40 feet lower in the <br /> deeper screened monitoring wells (MW-2A and MW-2B) than iii the shallow screened wells <br /> during the June and September 2,001 monitoring events, respectively <br />' During the June 2001 monitoring event, the ground water gradient was Inferred to be ` <br /> 0 003 ft/ft with a flow direction toward the west northwest,`during'the September 2001 <br />' monitoring event, the ground water gradient was Inferred to be 0 0015 ft/ft with a flow <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentwi,Inc <br /> t <br />