Laserfiche WebLink
e <br /> 1 I <br /> I J 1 <br /> 18 April 2001 <br />' `AGE-NC Protect No 00-0769 <br /> "'• Page 3 of 5 n <br /> z _ <br /> 3 3 SURVEYING <br /> The casmg elevation of wells MW-2A, 2B, 3A and 3B were surveyed relative to City of Stockton _ <br /> Bench Mark#184 On 07 March 2001, a California state-licensed survey engineer from Baumbach <br /> & Piazza, Inc surveyed a reference point on the top of each ground water monitoring well casing' <br /> of MW-2A, -2B, -3A and-3B to the nearest 0 01-foot relative to the City of Stockton Bench Mark J <br /> Datum at 1144 feet above mean sea level(msl) On 12 April 2001, MW-1 was surveyed relative to <br />' MW-2B by AGE personnel The results of the monitoring well survey are contained,in Table 1 The <br /> surveying report (Baumbach & Piazza) is presented in Appendix C <br /> 4.0. FINDINGS <br />' Ground water elevation and flow direction were calculated from field data, hydrocarbon-impact to <br /> ground water was assessed by laboratory analysis of the ground water samples <br />' 4 1 ' GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> The relative elevation of ground water m each well was calculated by subtracting the depth to ground <br /> - water from the surveyed well head elevations Table 1 During the December 2000 monitoring event <br /> y { } g g <br /> depths to ground water ranged from 23 93 feet to 24 84 feet below the tops of the well casings <br /> Ground water elevations at the site ranged from-13 81 feet in MW-1 to --14 16 in MW-3A relative <br /> to mean sea level The ground water gradient was calculated to be 0 0004 ft/ft with a flow direction <br />' toward the northeast (Figure 3) Depths to ground water during the March 2001 monitoring event <br /> ranged from 23 17 feet to 24 11 feet below the tops of the well casings Ground water elevations at <br /> the site ranged from -12 92 feet in MW-3B to -13 39 in MW-3A relative to mean sea level The <br /> Iground water gradient was calculated to be 0 0011 ft/ft with a flow direction,toward the southwest ' <br /> (Figure 4) , 1 - , <br /> r = <br /> 4 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF WATER SAMPLES <br />' TPH-g was detected in each sample analyzed during the December 2000 monitoring event at <br /> concentrations ranging from 1,500 micrograms per liter(µg/l) !n MW-2A to 190,000 µg/1 in MW-1 <br />' Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes were detected in samples analyzed from each well <br /> The highest concentrations were detected m MW-1 at 42,000 µg/l(toluene), 33,000 gg/l(benzene), <br /> 11,000 µg/1 (total xylenes) and 2,100 µg/l (ethylbenzene) <br />' MTBE, TBA, DIP E, ETBE, TAME and EDB were not detected above laboratory reporting limits <br /> i• <br /> in any of the'ground water samples analyzed 1,2 - DCA was detected in samples analyzed from <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc J <br /> I J <br /> J <br />