Laserfiche WebLink
MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION <br /> WORK PLAN <br /> Raymond Investment Corporation <br /> 730 E. Channel Street <br /> Stockton, California <br /> L. <br /> 1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> This work plan was prepared by Condor Earth Technologies, Inc. (Condor) to describe the proposed <br /> L+ installation of three groundwater monitoring wells at 730 E. Channel Street (site) in Stockton, California <br /> (Figures 1 and 2, Appendix A). In a letter dated July 7, 2004, Vicki McCartney of the San Joaquin <br /> County Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD) directed the preparation and submittal of a work <br /> 9.0 plan for the installation of three groundwater monitoring wells at the site. Condor prepared this work <br /> plan at the request of Beverly Garcia of Raymond Investment Corporation (property owner) in response <br /> to that directive. <br /> 6d <br /> All work conducted by Condor will be under the supervision of a California registered geologist. This <br /> ' work plan includes project background information; a description of the field, laboratory, and reporting <br /> L. procedures proposed to conduct the work; and a project schedule. <br /> 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND <br /> +� On April 29, 2003, Oil Equipment Services removed one underground storage tank(UST) and associated <br /> piping at the site. The UST was discovered as part of a Phase If Environmental Site Assessment <br /> performed in May, June, and September 2002, and completed for the City of Stockton Department of <br /> Housing and Redevelopment. The SJCEHD required removal of the UST. Condor representatives were <br /> on site to make field observations and collect soil samples following removal of the UST and the <br /> associated piping. Dina Abate of the SJCEHD was on site to observe the UST and piping removal <br /> ar activities and the collection of soil samples. <br /> The UST was an approximately 1,000-gallon capacity single-wall steel tank twelve feet long and four <br /> Lo feet in diameter. The excavation associated with the UST was approximately six feet by fifteen feet by <br /> six feet deep. Soil staining and petroleum odors were noted in the excavation and excavated soil. <br /> Groundwater was not encountered in the excavation. Approximately 85 feet of piping associated with the <br /> UST, a dispenser, and a diesel filter were also removed. Following removal of the UST, piping, <br /> dispenser, and filter, soil samples were collected from locations directed by Ms. Abate. The tank <br /> excavation was backfilled with pea gravel. <br /> s� <br /> Laboratory analytical results indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected at or above the <br /> laboratory reported detection limits in the soil samples collected from the north end of the UST <br /> excavation, from beneath the dispenser, and from two piping trenches. Total petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> quantified as gasoline (TPH-G), total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as motor oil (TEPH- <br /> MO), and total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel (TEPH-D) were detected at <br /> concentrations of 75 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), 18,000 mg/kg, and 2,400 mg/kg, respectively, in <br /> the soil sample collected from beneath the south end of the UST excavation at a depth of eight feet below <br /> the ground surface (bgs). TPH-G and TEPH-D were also detected at concentrations of 2.0 and 200 <br /> mg/kg, respectively, in the soil sample collected from beneath the location of the diesel filter. The UST <br /> CA CONDOR <br />