Laserfiche WebLink
nr U1 <br /> SITE BACKGROUND <br /> I <br /> Raymond Investment Corporation—730 Channel Street, Stockton, California <br /> On April 29, 2003, Oil Equipment Services removed one underground storage tank(UST) and associated <br /> piping at the Site The UST was discovered as part of a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment <br /> performed in May, June, and September 2002, and completed for the City of Stockton Department of <br /> Housing and Redevelopment The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD) <br /> required removal of the UST Condor representatives were on Site to make field observations and collect <br /> soil samples following removal of the UST and the associated piping Dina Abate of the SJCEHD was on <br /> Site to observe the UST and piping removal activities and the collection of soil samples <br /> The UST was an approximately 1,000-gallon capacity single-wall steel tank twelve feet long and four feet <br /> in diameter The excavation associated with the UST was approximately six feet by fifteen feet by six feet <br /> deep Soil staining and petroleum odors were noted in the excavation and excavated soil Groundwater <br /> was not encountered in the excavation Approximately 85 feet of piping associated with the UST, a <br /> dispenser, and a diesel filter were also removed Following removal of the UST, piping, dispenser, and <br /> filter, soil samples were collected from locations directed by Ms Abate The tank excavation was <br /> backfilled with pea gravel <br /> Laboratory analytical results indicated that petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected at or above the <br /> laboratory reported detection limits in the soil samples collected from the north end of the UST <br /> excavation, from beneath the dispenser, and from two piping trenches Total petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> quantified as gasoline (TPH-G), total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as motor oil (TEPH- <br /> MO), and total extractable petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel (TEPH-D) were detected at <br /> concentrations of 75 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), 18,000 mg/kg, and 2,400 mg/kg, respectively, in <br /> the soil sample collected from beneath the south end of the UST excavation at a depth of eight feet below <br /> ground surface (bgs) TPH-G and TEPH-D were also detected at concentrations of 2 0 and 200 mg/kg, <br /> respectively, in the soil sample collected from beneath the location of the diesel filter The UST removal <br /> activities and the results of the laboratory analyses were described by Condor in the Underground Storage <br /> Tank Rernoval Report dated May 14, 2003 <br /> In a letter dated November 4, 2003, to Beverly Garcia of the Raymond Investment Corporation, Victoria <br /> McCartney of the SJCEHD directed Raymond Investment Corporation to submit a work plan to <br /> investigate the lateral and vertical extent of contamination at the Site Condor prepared the Soil and <br /> Groundwater Investigation Work Plan, dated February 19, 2004, at the request of Ms Garcia in response <br /> to that letter Ms McCartney approved the work plan, with modifications, in a letter dated March 17, <br /> 2004 The modifications included the elimination of three proposed borings in the vicinity of the former <br /> UST location and the elimination of one proposed boring in the vicinity of the former location of the <br /> diesel filter and piping Ms McCartney also directed the soil and groundwater samples to be analyzed for <br /> 1,2-dibromoethane(EDB), methanol, and ethanol <br /> Condor conducted soil and groundwater investigation activities at the Site on May 5 and 6, 2004 The <br /> investigation included the installation of six direct push borings to collect soil and groundwater samples <br /> Laboratory analytical results of the soil and groundwater samples collected during the investigation <br /> indicated that the soil and groundwater at the Site were impacted by TPH-G and TEPH-D at those <br /> locations No petroleum hydrocarbons were detected at or above the laboratory reported detection limits <br /> in the three soil samples and the groundwater sample collected from boring SB-5, which was advanced <br /> adjacent to the former UST excavation This suggested that there was minimal impact to soil and <br />