Laserfiche WebLink
4. FTT.T. RiSF.R rnNTAiNMFNT RTTMP TTi.QTiN(_ <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ <br />Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br />❑ Other (Specie) <br />Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic <br />❑ Other (Spec) <br />Test Equipment Used: [neon Sump <br />Tester Equipment Resolution: +/- 0.002" <br />Fill Sump # 91 <br />=Depth: <br />48" <br />60" <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Highest Piping Penetration: <br />36" <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />19" <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />testing: <br />Good <br />Portion of Sump Tested <br />2" above piping <br />Sump Material: <br />Fiberglass <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: <br />30 minutes <br />Test Start Time: <br />10:48 am <br />Initial Reading (111): <br />3.7083 <br />Test End Time: <br />11:03 am <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />3.7084 <br />Test Duration: <br />15 min. <br />Change in Reading (RF -Rt): <br />+0.0001 <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />+/- 0.002" <br />Test Result: <br />® Pass 0 Fail <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? <br />® Yes ❑ No <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />detected? <br />❑ No ®NA <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />❑ No ❑ NA <br />LOYes <br />Was sensor properly replaced andverified functional after testin ?❑ <br />No ❑ NA <br />Comments — (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />"Sensor functionality was not confirmed. This procedure is not part of the Secondary Containment testing scope of work". <br />