My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001216
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
508
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0536689
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2019 1:47:31 PM
Creation date
3/4/2019 11:48:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001216
RECORD_ID
PR0536689
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0021073
FACILITY_NAME
STKN CHARTER WAY COMMINGLED PLUME
STREET_NUMBER
508
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16504016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
508 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms Victoria McCartney <br /> May 11, 2006 <br />' Page 2 of 4 <br /> . A three-volume purging and sample technique, using a decontaminated stack pump and disposable bailer, <br />' was used for groundwater purging and sample collection Field parameters were measured after each well <br /> volume using the following series of activities and sampling protocols <br /> • During the purge cycle, groundwater field parameter measurements consisting of specific <br /> conductance,pH, and temperature were measured using a groundwater water-quality meter <br /> • At least three times the volume of standing water was purged from the monitoring well <br /> Monitoring wells were purged until the field parameters noted above for each well stabilized <br /> Field parameters were recorded on a well volume basis <br />' • After the field parameters stabilized as specified, a groundwater sample was collected for analysis <br /> with a disposable polyethylene bailer and transferred to the appropriate laboratory-supplied <br /> sample container Pre-preserved laboratory-supplied containers were used for sample collection <br /> Groundwater monitoring and sampling field data sheets are presented as attachments to the G-R <br /> monitoring report,provided in Attachment 1 <br /> Subsequent to collection, samples were packed on ice, cooled to approximately 4°C, and shipped under <br /> appropriate chain-of-custody protocols for analysis to Lancaster Laboratories (Lancaster) of Lancaster <br /> Pennsylvania, a California-certified analytical laboratory Analyses included the following parameters <br /> • total petroleum hydrocarbons in the gasoline range [TPH-G (C6-CIO)], total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons in the diesel range [TPH-D (C10-C28)], total petroleum hydrocarbons in the motor <br /> oil range [TPH-MO (C 16-C36)], and methanol by United States Environmental Protection <br /> Agency (USEPA)Method 8015, <br /> o benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX)by USEPA Method 826013, and <br /> G t-butyl alcohol (TBA), methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), di-isopropyl alcohol (DIPE), ethyl <br /> tertiary butyl alcohol (ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2- <br /> DCA), ethylene dibromide(EDB), and ethanol by USEPA Method 8260B <br /> Quality assurance/quality control samples inclusive of trip blanks were also submitted for laboratory <br /> t analysis A laboratory supplied trip blank accompanied each sample delivery group Trip blank samples <br /> were collected at a rate of one per 20 samples for TPH-G, BTEX, and MTBE Analytical results for the <br /> quarterly groundwater monitoring event are included as attachments to the G-R monitoring report, <br /> provided in Attachment 1 <br /> Purge water and equipment decontamination water generated during the sampling event was <br /> containerized for off-site disposal <br /> Monitoring Results <br />' Depth to water measurements were subtracted from the surveyed top-of-casing elevation to calculate the <br /> groundwater elevations for each monitoring well Depth to water and the calculated groundwater <br /> elevations are presented in Table 1 of the G-R monitoring report(Attachment 1) Calculated groundwater <br /> elevation data were then used to construct the groundwater potentiometric map (Figure 1 of the G-R <br /> monitoring report,provided in Attachment 1) <br /> J ID000619-2033_00161022_First Qtr 2006 doe <br /> BLASLAND, BOUCK&LEE, INC <br /> engineers,scientists,economists <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.