Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /> S E C 0 R <br /> Conceptual Site Model <br /> March 24, 2004 <br /> Page 8 <br /> • Concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were assumed to be distributed linearly with <br /> depth, and, <br /> • A porosity of 35 percent, which corresponds to "silty-sand" (Amenean Society for Testing <br /> Materials —D2488) was used to calculate the approximate mass remaining in soil <br /> Analytical data from soil samples collected at the site indicate that typically, the maximum € <br /> concentrations of hydrocarbons,ris found at approximately 4 feet bgs Degradation rates were used <br /> to estimate the mass of TPHd, TPHg, BTEX, and MtBE remaining in soil as of September 1996 A <br /> given mass of TPHd, TPHg, BTEX, and MtBE is known to decrease (decay) at a rate proportional to <br /> the amount originally present The equation used for estimating the mass of hydrocarbons <br /> d <br /> remaining in sod is presented in Appendix E Half life coefficients were obtained from Environmental <br /> Degradation Rates, (Howard et al 1991) The mass decay rate calculation is presented in Appendix <br /> F Mass balance calculations completed for TPHg, TPHd, BTEX, and MtBE indicate that the mass of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons in soil on September 1996 was 2762 0 pounds (lbs) 720 5 Ib, 12 9 lbs, 18 4 <br /> lbs, 43 3 lbs, 221 0 lbs, and 25 8 lbs, respectively Based on known decay rates for TPHd, TPHg, <br /> BTEX, and MtBE calculations indicate that approximately 16 2 pounds of TPHg remains in soil <br /> 5.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> • In March 1995, following the installation of MW-1 through MW-3 groundwater monitoring and <br /> sampling was initiated Groundwater elevations have risen approximately 10 feet since monitoring <br /> and sampling began Although the groundwater flow direction has been shown to vary, the principal <br /> a <br /> groundwater flow direction at the Site appears to be to the northeast (Figures 6 and 7) <br /> 5.1 Groundwater Chemical Concentration Trends <br /> t <br /> Groundwater analytical results were obtained from groundwater monitoring reports and the <br /> 61 <br /> GeoTracker database for the site and surrounding properties An evaluation of onsite and offsite <br /> groundwater analytical data is summarized in sections 51 1 and 5 1 2, respectively Clean up levels <br /> for TPHg and MtBE were derived from the following documents <br /> N <br /> • MtBE/Benzene Water Quality Goals were derived from the RWQCB-CVR, A <br /> Compilation of Water Quality Goals, August 2000 maximum contaminant level goals <br /> (MCL) Secondary MCL 5 0 micrograms per liter (µg/L) and primary MCL 1 0 µg/l_ for <br /> MtBE and benzene, respectively, <br /> • TPHg CRWQCB - San Francisco Bay Region's (CRWQCB-SFBR) Volume 2 <br /> Background Documentation for the Development of Tier 1 Soil and Groundwater <br /> Screening Levels, dated August 2000, risk based screening levels (RBSL) RBSL <br /> (groundwater that is not a current or potential source of drinking water) 5,000 pg/L - ddt "W,�� <br /> A chemical concentration map is presented as Figure 9 Historical groundwater monitoring and <br /> sampling data and data obtained from the GeoTracker database is presented in Appendix G <br /> I IClievrori1920331REPORTSICSMICSM 92033 (REV B) doc <br /> ) <br />