Laserfiche WebLink
S E C ® R <br /> . Conceptual Site Model z <br /> March 24, 2004 <br /> Page 20 <br /> pounds of TPHg, 720 pounds of TPHd, 8W&pounds of BTEX, and 26 pounds MtBE remained in soil <br /> beneath the Site on September 1996 Information obtained from a file review conducted by SECOR <br /> indicated that SVE was the most appropriate remediation technology in the vicinity of the Site due <br /> to a relatively low mass remaining in soil and an approximate 10-foot increase in groundwater <br /> elevations since monitoring and sampling was initiated Based on soil mass balance calculations <br /> monitored natural attenuation may be the most appropriate course of action a <br /> The extent of impacted sod beneath the site should be explored through additional site assessment <br /> activities Based on data obtained from future site assessment work a more accurate estimate of the <br /> mass of petroleum hydrocarbons remaining in soil can be calculated Proposed site assessment h <br /> activities are presented in section 9 0 !b T-P 08 16 Wrp r <br /> .. 1+(A � <br /> 8 3 2 Groundwater Condition Summary 0 2 I b TP�kp Z 16 b„T,*t <br /> Groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells located onsite indicate a general decline in <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations over time (Figures 10 through 12) Mass balance estimates <br /> milli t� tl� t appraximately, 7 pounds of TPHgr036 5 pounds of 8.7 pounds of benzene, <br /> anc�1 pLnds of MtBE remains in groundwater beneath the site Information obtained from a file <br /> review conducted by SECOR indicated that groundwater extraction and treatment was not an 4 <br /> effective remediation technology in the vicinity of the Site Groundwater mass balance calculations <br /> and data reported by adjacent sites indicate that augmented monitored natural attenuation may be <br /> the most appropriate course of action for the remediation of groundwater beneath the Site <br /> Onsite wells do not define TPHg to the north, east, and west Onsite rlls do not define benzene to <br /> the north, east, and west and onsite wells do not define MtBE to the east Existing data suggests <br /> that groundwater is laterally and vertically defined offsite to the north, northeast, and east, with the <br /> exception of former Texaco monitoring well MW-18-80 and MW-18-120 Data to be collected from <br /> the proposed monitoring wells should provide a more accurate estimate of the mass of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons remaining in groundwater Proposed site assessment activities are presented in } <br /> section 9 0 <br /> 8.4 Groundwater Receptors <br /> 1 <br /> Groundwater analytical data reported from monitoring wells located north, northeast and east of the <br /> Site indicates that groundwater immediately down gradient of the Site does not appear to be <br /> significantly impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons (Figure 9) Groundwater concentrations reported <br /> from monitoring wells located down and cross gradient of the Site indicate that natural attenuation is <br /> sufficient to reduce hydrocarbon concentrations to low levels <br /> A Mass flux calculation was completed to assess hydrocarbon impact to water supply wells identified <br /> in section 7 0 The mass flux calculations were based on the following assumptions <br /> • To conservatively estimate the mass of MtBE In groundwater a site-wide concentration <br /> of 590 pg/L was assumed, <br /> • Concentrations of constituents in the dissolved phase are assumed to vary linearly with <br /> 40 distance This assumption was made to facilitate a calculation by removing the <br /> I %Chevron\920331REPORTSICSMICSM 92033(REV B)doc <br />