My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
515
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0527799
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2019 2:43:14 PM
Creation date
3/4/2019 1:26:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0527799
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0018844
FACILITY_NAME
TRANSMISSION STORE
STREET_NUMBER
515
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14707408
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
515 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />Ms. Lori Duncan <br />April 12, 2002 <br />Page 6 <br />Project 880-039.1A <br />One of the major disadvantages of pump -and -treat is that the degree of contaminant <br />removal is highly dependent on the chemical nature of the contaminant and the <br />subsurface geology. Sites where the contaminants are in a mobile, dissolved state and <br />minimal sorption has occurred are ideal for pump -and -treat remediation. The success of <br />the remediation also depends on whether the subsurface hydrogeology is relatively <br />homogeneous or uniform. These conditions are rarely met, and the effectiveness of the <br />pump -and -treat method is questionable when the conditions are not ideal. The <br />difficulties encountered with contaminant chemistry and subsurface geology <br />heterogeneity often increases the cost and time required to achieve remediation goals <br />consistent with regulatory requirements. In addition, pumping groundwater from <br />multiple zones can increase the potential for cross contamination and accelerate vertical <br />migration of contaminants. <br />To establish if groundwater extraction and treatment would be a feasible alternative at <br />this site a step -draw down extraction test is proposed. The step -draw down test will be <br />performed in well MW -4R -S. The test will consist of pumping the well at four <br />successively higher discharge rates of 90 minutes duration for each rate. The proposed <br />discharge rates will be approximately 2, 5, 8, and 10 gallons per minute (gpm). <br />Extracted water will be stored onsite prior to disposal. <br />During these tests, depth to water will be measured in the pumped well at the following <br />elapsed times after the beginning of each step at a minimum: 1, 2, 4, 10, 20, 50, and <br />90 minutes. At the end of each step, depth to water will also be measured in wells <br />MW -1 R, VW -2 and VW -3. Static water level measurements will be obtained in the test <br />well and the nearest monitoring well within ten minutes before start of pumping. <br />Discharge measurements will be made each time a water level measurement is made in <br />the pumped well. <br />After testing, the pump will be turned off and the aquifer allowed to recover for at least <br />two hours. The data analysis will focus on the relationship between discharge and <br />drawdown, and these results will be presented as a graph to be used by IT in the <br />evaluation of groundwater extraction and treatment feasibility. <br />IT CORPORATION <br />SAC:\\\SACRFP 1 \COMMON\sacDP\2002\PRJ\PJ8\880\8800391 A.2ac.doc <br />(01040000) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.