Laserfiche WebLink
Ms Lori Duncan Project No 880-039 IA <br /> June 18, 2003 <br /> Page 10 <br />' DISCUSSION <br /> Based on the results of this investigation and historical data, impact beneath the site <br /> appears mainly in groundwater where TPHg concentrations on-site were reported up to <br /> 62,000 ug/l in well MW-4RS Well MW-4RS is located adjacent to the former USTs, <br />' and is within the area of highest dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations reported at the <br /> site In deep well boring MW-4R, soil impact is reported only below the water table <br /> (Table 1), and there the resulting concentrations are comparable to groundwater results <br /> (Table 2, MW-4RS and MW-4RD) The reported hydrocarbon concentrations in soil are <br /> likely the result of dissolved hydrocarbons, indicating that there does not appear to be a <br /> residual hydrocarbon source on-site The declining hydrocarbon concentrations with <br /> depth in soil in well boring MW-4R is probably an attribute of the hollow-stem auger <br />' drilling process and not due to the downward migration of TPHg and BTEX <br /> hydrocarbons, which tend to concentrate near the top of the water column Figure 3 <br /> shows the extent of dissolved TPHg in shallow groundwater at the site, and Figure 4 <br /> shows the distribution of soil encountered beneath the site As Figure 3 shows, the <br /> majority of dissolved hydrocarbons is located beneath the site in the area of the former <br /> USTs, and is generally delineated downgradient of the site, which is expected due to the <br /> historically shallow groundwater gradient Oxygenate compound DIPE, ETBE, MtBE, <br /> TAME, or TBA, or the lead scavengers 1,2-DCA or EDB were not detected in soil or <br /> groundwater during this investigation <br /> The results of the feasibility remedial tests indicate that groundwater extraction does not <br /> appear viable due to the low flow rates achieved in the test, but the addition of air <br /> sparging to the existing SVE operation is a feasible remedial option Figure 5 shows <br /> historical vapor concentration extraction trends from wells VW-2S and VW-3S The <br /> trends in both wells, as well as the overall system extraction trend, are declining As <br /> Figure 5 shows, during the air sparge test on April 8, 2003, vapor concentrations from <br /> wells VW-2S and VW-3S, represented by the larger symbols, increased at least ten-fold <br /> over the previous year's average concentrations Because the remaining hydrocarbons <br /> on-site appear to be in groundwater, the effectiveness of the existing SVE system will <br /> k1SACRFP 11COMMONIsacDPti20031Pg188018800391 A Sae doc <br />