Laserfiche WebLink
4�+ <br /> 1 <br />' Mr Don Rodgers Project 792774 01000000 <br /> May 2, 2000 <br /> Page 2 <br />' Between September 17 and October 11, 1996, EMCON observed the drilling of six soil borings <br /> (B-1R through B-6R) One soil boring was converted to monitoring well MW-1R, three soil <br /> borings were converted to dual completion vapor extraction wells VW-1 through VW-3, and one <br />' soil boring was converted to a single vapor extraction well VW-4 (EMCON, Preliminary <br /> Investigation and Evaluation Report, February 5, 1997) The results of this investigation <br /> indicated the following <br /> 1 With the exception of soil samples collected from boring B-6R, residual hydrocarbons <br /> were detected in each boring The highest concentrations were detected approximately <br />' 10 feet below ground surface (bgs) near the former USTs Total oil and grease was <br /> detected in the soil sample collected near the former UST cavity (located near the <br /> building) at a concentration of 10,000 parts per million Polychlorinated bi-phenyls, <br />' TPHD, and chlorinated hydrocarbons were below laboratory detection limits in all soil <br /> samples analyzed from soil borings B-2R and B-6R <br />' TPHG, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) isomers, and methyl <br /> tert-butyl ether (MTBE) were detected in the groundwater sample collected from <br /> monitoring well MW-1R TPHG and benzene were detected at concentrations of 33,000 <br /> parts per billion (ppb) and 1,400 ppb, respectively MTBE was detected at a <br /> concentration of 550 ppb <br />' GROUNDWATER MONITORING: FIRST QUARTER 2000 <br />' On February 22 and 25, 2000, an IT technician was on site to measure depth to groundwater and <br /> collect a groundwater sample from well MW-1R for subjective and laboratory analyses Floating <br /> product was not observed in groundwater monitoring well MW-1R (see Table 1 and Appendix A) <br />' IT used these data to evaluate changes in concentrations of dissolved gasoline hydrocarbons in the <br /> groundwater IT's sampling and analysis procedures are presented in Appendix B <br />' The groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-1R was analyzed at Sequoia <br /> Analytical in Sacramento, California The groundwater sample was analyzed for TPHG using <br /> U S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Modified Methods 8015, and for BTEX and <br /> MTBE using USEPA Method 8020 Copies of the chain-of-custody records and laboratory <br /> analysis reports are presented in Appendix C <br /> The results of laboratory analyses indicated that dissolved hydrocarbons were present in the <br /> monitoring well TPHG was detected at a concentration of 3,380 micrograms per liter (µg/L}, <br /> BTEX constituents were detected at concentrations of 403 µg/L, 72 µg/L, 191 µg/L, and 191 µgfL, <br /> respectively, and MTBE was below raised laboratory detection limits at <25 µg/L using USEPA <br /> 1 Method 8020 Results of laboratory analyses are presented in the Table 1 Groundwater analytical <br /> IC"1CamPkUData\ArchivelRodgerslQtrlyIRDGRIg6o doc-981ot I IT Corporation <br />