Laserfiche WebLink
Er � �-�� 'y, �'.� ��'.rr -;t, G.33,,�,,z:`*SF"',�,.`..". �w ���^' rn-ti"^^'1. �a.�R,._,"�"" ��°i'. A^�..,_�".2�`'c.,,HY`�-�-, �" C`���a:. ,,',,,;C -.ten•` <br /> rte. i�- � a �� �. Y7�f. `"L.'^� ��&� y `�.-:" �. 7r.,- '.+i+� '� r-r�., ''N"�N�:r�'' �•:4 ��' =::ar'-''� .w�-"' ��,,y�4.ry�-` <br /> Ms. Diane Hinson <br /> March 6, 1490 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Cross-sce!ion locations are illustrated in Figure 3,and LL:cross-sections appear as Figures 4 (A-A) <br /> and 5 (B-B'). <br /> Each monitoring well was consiructcd of 4-inch diameter,schedule 40 PVC material to a depth of 40 <br /> feet below grade. The wells were screened from 40 to 20 feet below grade with #20-slot (0.020-inch <br /> slot width) screen. Details of monitoring welt construction are contained in Enclosure G The <br /> monitoring wells were developed, purged, and sampled in accordance with methods outlined in <br /> Enclosure A,Sections 3,4, and S. A ground water sample from each well was submitted for analysis <br /> of benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and xylenes(BTEX),and total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline <br /> (TPH(g)) using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Department of Health <br /> Services (DHS) approved methods. <br /> Soil Samnle_Analvtical Results <br /> A portion of each soil sample collected from the soil borings was sealed in a plastic bag and brought <br /> to ambient air temperature. The headspace of the bag was then screened with a photoionization <br /> detector (PID). The highest PID reading for each sample was recorded on the boring logs <br /> (Enclosure B). PID measurements were made using an hNu which was calibrated to a benzene <br /> standard. Readings provide only a relative measure of organic vapor content. Readings are reported <br /> in `hNu units',which are approximately correlative to parts per million(ppm). <br /> PID screening results indicate that organic vapors were present above background levels in soil <br /> samples collected from borings for monitoring wells MW-2,MW-5,and MW-7 at depths between 10 <br /> and 30 feet below grade. The highest PID readings recorded in samples collected from boring MW-2 <br /> were M and 50 ppm at 15 and 25 feet below grade, respectively. The PID readings recorded for <br /> MW-5 indicated vapor concentrations of 80 ppm at 25 and 30 feet below grade. The highest PID <br /> readings for soil samples collected from MW-7 were 680 and 2200 ppm at 20 and 30 feet below grade, <br /> respectively. PID screening results are compiled in Table I. <br /> TABLE I <br /> PID Screening Results <br /> Depth Below <br /> Grade (feed MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6 MW-7 <br /> 5 0 0 0 0 14 0 10 <br /> 10 0 3 0 0 20 0 80 <br /> 15 0 80 8 0 20 0 75 <br /> 20 0 15 15 0 24 Il 680 <br /> 25 0 50 19 15 80 0 54 <br /> 30 0 30 1 5 80 2 2 00 <br /> 35 0 25 3 10 20 1 30 <br /> 40 0 23 11 --' 20 ... 25 <br /> NOTES: <br /> All measurements made on sample:container hendspace usin,a PID(hNu). The hNu was calibrated <br /> to a benzene standard to read in parts per million. Readings reflect relative organic .anc.r <br /> concentrations. <br /> 'Not sampled. <br />