Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 5 <br /> in the sampling schedule. If groundwater from MW-11 remains clean, then I don't think we need to <br /> worry about contamination coming from 641 Charter Way. If groundwater contamination increases <br /> in MW-11, then we should talk about possibly having ownership of MW-11 transferred to the <br /> responsible party at 641 Charter Way. <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Phone: (209) 468-9852 <br /> Email: vmccartneyCa?sjcehd.com <br /> From: Barton, Jim@Waterboards [mailto:iim.bartonCabwaterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 2:02 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH]; Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Voice Message from AGE re: 701 East Charter Way concerns with 641 E. <br /> Charter Way <br /> Hi Vicki, <br /> I spoke with Daniel this morning and do not share Daniel's concerns that the AGE rebound <br /> test will be compromised if 641 E. Charter starts air sparging. If there is migration from 641 <br /> E. Charter Way, it should show up in the west wells along the sidewalk at 641 E. Charter Way <br /> long before it reaches the 701 E. Charter onsite monitoring or DPE wells. <br /> However, I am open to recommending transfer of the west wells to 641 E. Charter Way prior <br /> to 701's closure. <br /> What do you think? <br /> Thanks. <br /> Jim Barton <br /> James L. L. Barton P. G. <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive, #200 <br /> Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114 <br /> Office (916) 464-4615 <br /> Fax (916) 464-4645 <br /> 4/16/?()14 <br />