Laserfiche WebLink
40, -we <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> .C, Environmental Health Department DIRECTOR <br /> Donna Heran,REHS <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205-6232 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> ` Robert McClellon,REHS <br /> Jeff Carruesco, REHS,RDI <br /> cq' •.....•ci�P Website: www.sjgov.org/ehd Kasey Foley,REHS <br /> F o R Linda Turkatte,REHS <br /> Phone: (209) 468-3420 Rodney Estrada, REHS <br /> Fax: (209)464-0138 Adrienne Ellsaesser,REHS <br /> January 22, 2014 <br /> Messrs. Kirk Larson, PG, and Robert Trommer, CHG <br /> State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund <br /> PO Box 944212 <br /> Sacramento CA 94244-2120 <br /> Subject: 701 Charter Way E., Stockton, CA <br /> 2014 Review Summary Report Response CUF Claim No 12741 <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has received and reviewed the <br /> Review Summary Report- Closure dated 02 January 2014 for the fifth annual review of the site <br /> from Robert Trommer of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Cleanup Fund <br /> (Fund) for above-referenced site. The Fund has recommended case closure. <br /> The Fund evaluation indicated the impediments to closure identified by the EHD (incomplete <br /> conceptual site model, remaining secondary source, and not meeting Policy direct contact <br /> criteria) had already been adequately addressed. The Fund determined that the case meets all <br /> eight general criteria, groundwater specific criteria by Class 2, has the active service station <br /> exemption for vapor intrusion to indoor air, and the case meets the direct contact/exposure to <br /> outdoor air through a professional site-specific risk assessment performed by the Fund. <br /> Impacted soil and groundwater have been undergoing remediation through dual phase <br /> extraction (DPE). Since the vapor extraction portion of the system was initiated in January 2011, <br /> approximately 5,225 pounds of hydrocarbons have been recovered from subsurface soil, and <br /> the mass recover rate has declined to low levels. <br /> Groundwater extraction was initiated in February 2011 and approximately 320 pounds of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons have been removed, but groundwater samples have been slow to <br /> exhibit the effects of DPE, perhaps due to residual contaminant mass in saturated zone soil not <br /> being fully addressed by the DPE. Depth to water has been approximately 28 feet below surface <br /> grade during remediation, while impacted soil extends to 45 feet bsg. <br /> The Fund gives the plume length as less than 250 feet and benzene concentrations less than <br /> 3,000 micrograms per liter (pg/1) to fit groundwater specific criteria Class 2. The EHD notes that <br /> the benzene concentrations have been less than 3000 pg/I in the most intensely impacted <br /> monitoring wells only during the last two or three monitoring events. The EHD also notes that <br /> contaminant concentrations have been increasing sharply in monitoring well MW-6 over the last <br /> two monitoring events. MW-6 is located toward the south of the former UST system. As the <br /> benzene concentrations less than 3000 pg/I have been only achieved recently during active <br /> 2014 Review Summary Report Recommendations Response CUF Claim No 12741.doc <br />