Laserfiche WebLink
"r <br /> CALIFORNIA GEOPHYSICAL GROUP, INC. <br /> P O Box 691, Poway, CA 92074 Tel- (619) 486-1323 <br /> FAX. (619) 486-2329 <br /> November 20, 1992 REAft fAM <br /> DEC 0 1992 <br /> Public Health Services ENVIRONMEN11#, t, <br /> San Joaquin County � RM1T/ rj <br /> P. O, Box 2009 <br /> Stockton, Ca 95307 $ V <br /> RE= Quarterly Report October 1992 - rte <br /> Darpetro Service Station <br /> 749 E Charter Way <br /> Stockton, Ca <br /> Site # 1060 <br /> The site was sampled on October 27, 1992 and the laboratory <br /> analysis of the water samples were done by Sherwood Labs of <br /> Hilmar, California. The water table measurements, sampling <br /> parameters and chain of custody are attached. <br /> Table I lists the history of the water analysis taken at the <br /> site since Jan 26, 1990. Table II is the history of the water <br /> table measurements, and Table III list the history of Hydraulic <br /> Gradients Attached is one water table elevation plot showing <br /> the approximate groundwater gradient. <br /> The water samples were obtained by using a pre-cleaned teflon <br /> bailer and new section of rope This was performed after the <br /> measured field parameters had stabilized during the purging <br /> operation. See protocols Water samples were placed in <br /> appropriate glass containers with teflon-lined lids. <br /> EISDINO <br /> The water table has gone down about 2 feet since the last <br /> measurement The gradient direction has shifted 20 degrees to <br /> the north The slope of the gradient has increased 15 times <br />! The groundwater contamination has increased in wells 5 and 6 <br /> and decreased in well 4 Since the gradient has shifted <br /> slightly away from well 4 we believe this is the cause of the <br /> reduction in contaminants. Both odor and sheen were noted in <br /> wells 5 and odor was noted in well 6 <br />! The statistical evaluation of the combined data indicate a true <br /> gradient will be found if there is a difference across the <br /> sampled site of 0, 5 feet This is the case and therefore we <br /> can be assured the gradient is correct <br />