Laserfiche WebLink
placed about 10 feet east and south of a tank, which was located at the south and east side of the <br /> Property It is conceivable that high zones of MtBE were present but undefined We believe the <br /> main conduit is the sand zone located at 50 feet bgs and deeper This zone does not have any <br /> identified clay barrier and it is believed that contaminate flow is unobstructed along it's coarse In <br /> our cross-section we have noted the tPH and MtBE concentrations from the 641 E Charter Way <br /> boring is toward our well MW-11 The tanks were removed from this site in 2000 <br /> The ARCO station at 701 East Charter Way is also contaminated with BTEX and oxygenates <br /> Contamination records are available, since this is a LUFT site One of our questions is are they <br /> the source of the contamination or are they reflecting the contamination from the site at 641 E <br /> Charter Way, which is across Stanislaus Street in a westerly direction A review of the Second <br /> Quarterly Report, 2003, the MtBE levels at this site are down significantly The were in the 2000 <br /> to 8500 ug/L range in 1998 to 2002 and have fallen to 350 ug/L in April 2003 in well MW-1, which <br /> Iis the closest well to the site at 641 East Charter Way <br /> At the 749 E Charter Way site the levels of MtBE in well BM-3 have been present since January <br /> I 1998 and are present at this time When we drilled boring B-3, no MtBE was found at the surface <br /> of the groundwater We drilled and sampled the water at 50 and 60 feet below the surface and <br /> found that the results were 2 1 and 16 5 ug/L respectively This increase indicated that the <br /> contaminated water was coming from another source and it was the same scenano we <br /> encountered at HP-2 where the water enters this site at 55 feet The soil units at boring B-3 were <br /> silt and silty sand and we obtained water samples to 50 and 60 feet bgs <br /> SAs contaminated water flows, the concentration becomes lower, if it does not encounter another <br /> contaminated plume It also becomes less contaminated as it flows vertically down the water <br /> column The center of any plume remains relatively stable as it flows and can only be diluted if the <br /> outer portions of the plume are diluted <br /> The oxygenates or at least TAME, TBA, MtBE and EtBE dissolve in the water and when they do <br /> this solution of water and oxygenates becomes slightly heavier than the groundwater Therefore, <br /> the solution sinks as it travels along the plume path The sinking is about 1 foot for each 20 feet at SG`'• <br /> the flow gradient at Charter Way If the plume sinks to a level where it encounters a clay layer, it <br /> continues to sink but more slowly than in sand or silty sand s FjiCM� <br /> We havere ared two sets of contour maps for October 97 and Jul 98 Each sets includes <br /> P p p Y <br /> contour maps for Tert-Butanol and MtBE In 1997, the Tert-Butanol map shows the contaminated <br />' groundwater entering the site from Charter Way in two prongs, one south of wells BM-7 and BM-9 <br /> and the other south,of BM-8 At the same time, the MtBE is entering the site south of BM-4 The <br /> same soil unit, a silty sand, is present at both BM-7 and BM-4 Perhaps the MtBE is flowing <br /> through the water at a faster rate than the TBA <br /> In 1998 both the TBA and the MtBE appear to be entering from the west, but we did not sample <br />' wells BM-7 or BM-9 by EPA 8260 The pattern in 1999 is the same as in 1998 In 2000 the pattern <br /> is similar to that of 1997 In 2001 the water was entering from under San Gardens and from the <br /> south at 749 E Charter Way In 2002 the pattern is entering from the west under the Sun <br /> Gardens <br /> What this means, is that water is entering our site from the clay barrier under Sun Gardens and <br />' from the south at Charter Way, by two plumes in the groundwater Once the water level had risen <br /> 6 <br />