Laserfiche WebLink
LO Owlagical J"e&N,r-s lac <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report page 7 <br /> Project No.724.2 <br /> May 16,2005 <br /> +.rte <br /> premise that the data we considered, although incomplete, are representative of actual site <br /> conditions. We acknowledge that there may be undiscovered conditions, which would upon <br /> their consideration,change our interpretation and thus our conclusions. <br /> V <br /> Conclusions <br /> • The groundwater plume does not display a typical "core" but exhibits wide variations <br /> in contaminant concentration in both vertical and lateral planes as shown in Figures 6 <br /> - 11. Generally the plume has migrated down gradient of the source and is displaced <br /> east of the former UST: <br /> �- o The highest MTBE concentrations detected in the intermediate and deep aquifers <br /> were in wells MW-106 (19.0 [tg/1), MW-208 (15.0 [.g/1) and MW-209 (13.0 Vg/l), <br /> respectively. <br /> o MW-7 contains MTBE (3.3 Rg/L). <br /> o The contaminated shallow, intermediate and deep wells are down gradient from <br /> LN the former UST and dispenser locations areas to the east in the predominant <br /> groundwater direction. <br /> o In addition, the highest TPH-G concentrations were detected to the east of the site <br /> in wells MW-106 and MW-208, and the highest Benzene concentrations were <br /> detected to the east and northeast in wells MW-106 and MW-108 in the <br /> r intermediate wells, and MW-208 in the deep wells, respectively. <br /> V <br /> .�.� • In their correspondence dated September 3, 2002, the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department (SJC/EHD) identified two LUFT sites (701 E. <br /> Charter Way and 749 E. Charter Way) as being up gradient of the subject site. The <br /> ,,. contamination detected in the MW-108/208 location may be partly or entirely <br /> originated from an offsite source. <br /> • The SJC/EHD also stated in their above letter that a sandy interval at 70 — 80 bgs <br /> �.. could be acting as lateral conduit for contaminant migration. The presence of <br /> contamination in deep wells MW-208 and MW-209 support this theory. However <br /> GTI still suggests that the low concentrations of TPH-G & MTBE in these wells do <br /> *� not warrant an engineered clean up. <br /> • The data shows that a relatively stable, wide spread, low concentration plume of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon compounds are present in the groundwater at this site. The <br /> deeper TPH-G plume is not defined to the north and the deeper MTBE plume is not <br /> defined to the east. <br /> #" Recommendations <br /> • Maintain the current quarterly monitoring schedule to determine contaminant and <br /> gradient trends. <br /> • To further define the lateral extent of the groundwater plume, the work as outlined in <br /> the April 18, 2005 letter from San Joaquin County should be performed. This work is <br /> in progress. <br /> .. <br />