Laserfiche WebLink
G�lagccal Tecknccs lnc Page 6 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 724 2 <br /> February 7,2005 <br />' 1 TPH-G <br /> • None of the shallow monitoring wells contained TPH-G above the laboratory <br />' reporting limits, and therefore a contour diagram was not produced <br /> • Figure 6 illustrates the distribution of TPH-G in the intermediate wells A localized <br /> high is centered in well MW-106 and the concentrations attenuate to the locations of <br /> MW-107 & MW-108 <br /> • Figure 7 illustrates the distribution of TPH-G in the deep wells A localized high is <br /> centered in well MW-208 and the concentrations attenuate to non-detectable levels in <br />' the southwest and south locations of MW-202, MW-209 &MW-210 <br /> 2 MTBE <br /> • None of the shallow monitoring wells contained MTBE above the laboratory <br />' reporting limits, and therefore a contour diagram was not produced <br /> • Figure 8 illustrates the distribution of MTBE in the intermediate wells A localized <br /> high of 15 3 Itg/l is present in well MW-106 that attenuates west to the location of <br />' MW-107 <br /> • Figure 9 illustrates the distribution of MTBE in the deep wells A node of MTBE (59 <br />' µg11) is present in well MW-209 that attenuates to the northwest to the location of <br /> MW-208 <br /> 3 Benzene <br /> • None of the shallow monitoring wells contained Benzene above the laboratory <br /> reporting limits, and therefore a contour diagram was not produced <br /> • Figure 10 illustrates the distribution of Benzene in the intermediate wells Trace <br /> tconcentrations are present in wells MW-106 & MW-108 <br /> • Figure 11 illustrates the distribution of Benzene in the deep wells A node of elevated <br /> Benzene concentration (1 1 [ug/l) is present in well MW-208 that attenuates to non- <br /> detectable levels in the southeast, south and southwest locations of MW-209, MW- <br /> 210 & MW-202, respectively <br />' Oxidation/Reduction Potential (ORP) and dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements (Table 6) <br /> show that all of the sampled wells have a mixture of positive and negative ORP values and <br /> low DO readings The negative ORP values observed in the wells show that they are either <br /> within the core of the contamination plume or are in the reaction depletion shadow down <br /> gradient of the plunge Dissolved oxygen values corroborate with the ORP values measured <br /> in these wells and suggest that the plume is relatively stable <br />' r 12 —MW-2 TPH-G vs GW Elevation with the exception of June 20, <br /> As indicated in Figure p <br />' 1997, contaminant concentrations have generally mimicked the pattern of groundwater <br /> elevation changes for the past 10 years in down gradient well MW-2 The well was non- <br /> detect for the second time in the investigation <br />