Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> C7eotogica!rechnas Inc Page 2 <br /> Monta <br /> Additional Site Characterization Report <br /> Project No 724 2 <br /> Apnl 19,2004 <br />' soils from beneath the former USTs and product piping areas were excavated for disposal <br /> The resulting excavations were advanced to depths of 20-28 feet bgs, which generated <br />' approximately 750 cubic yards of soil for disposal <br /> Three monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-3) were installed in September 1992 to <br /> determine if groundwater had been impacted by the release—see Figure 2 for well locations <br />' Groundwater samples obtained from the wells confirmed that BTEX and TPH-G were <br /> present and the contaminant concentrations exhibited minor fluctuations during 18 <br /> monitoring events conducted between 1992 and 1999 Two additional monitoring wells <br />' (MW-4 and MW-5) were installed in September 1999, and incorporated into the monitoring <br /> schedule Samples obtained in November 1999 and March 2000 from well MW-4 <br /> contained elevated levels of benzene and TPH-G for the two events <br />' On November 20 —22, 2000, five additional groundwater monitoring wells were installed to <br /> investigate the lateral and vertical extent of gasoline-range petroleum hydrocarbons in the <br /> groundwater MW-6, MW-7, MW-104, MW-106 and MW-107 (see Figure 2) Wells MW- <br /> 6 and MW-106 were placed on the adjacent parcel to the east of the site, approximately 60 <br /> feet south of MW-5 Wells MW-7 and MW-107 were placed approximately 15 feet east of <br /> the former UST field A discretely screened deep well, MW-104, was placed adjacent to the <br /> t former dispenser island on the western portion of the site The installation of these wells <br /> completed the definition of the soil plume, as soil samples from these bonngs did not <br /> contain detectable contamination <br /> It appears that the soil plume is defined by <br /> ❑ MW-3 and MW-5 to the north and northwest <br /> ❑ MW-2, MW-6 and MW-106 to the east <br />' ❑ MW-1 to the south <br /> ❑ MW-4 is interpreted to be on the edge of the soil plume on the west under Grant Street <br />' The shallow groundwater plume is evident in well MW-4 and defined laterally to the east <br /> (down gradient) by MW-5, MW-6 and MW-7 The presence of TPH-G contamination in <br /> intermediate wells MW-106 and MW-107 suggests that a submerged plume is being <br /> sourced by residual soil contamination beneath the present water table (at approximately 38 <br />' feet below surface in December 2003) It is noted that the screened intervals of these wells <br /> (55-60 feet bgs) are placed near the elevation of the groundwater table in 1992 — <br /> approximately 54 feet bgs <br />' In our March 18, 2002 "Risk Evaluation & Appendix B Closure Checklist" work plan, <br /> Geological Technics Inc (GTI) proposed performing contaminant mass estimate <br /> calculations and limited fate and transport calculations This work plan was submitted to <br />' the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (SJC/EHD) and is necessary to <br /> receive site closure concurrence from the Regional Water Quality Control Board In their <br /> letter correspondence dated April 24, 2002, the SJC/EHD denied GTI's work plan and <br />' directed that a work plan for additional plume definition be submitted <br /> Geological Technics Inc (GTI) submitted our June 27, 2002 "Additional Site <br />' Characterization Work Plan - Monitoring Well Installation"work plan to meet the SJC/EHD <br /> directive The work plan proposed the installation of four sets of off-site monitoring wells <br /> to define the lateral extent of the contamination <br />