Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 1 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From : Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 3 : 17 PM <br /> To: 'rmarty@advgeoenv.com' <br /> Subject: RE: CPT Nomellini <br /> got em . <br /> thanks . . <br /> go ahead and send in the work plan and mucho/many cross sections with your new eval of the HUs. . . . . . Nuel <br /> wants to use the x-sects to validate your proposed MW installs. <br /> Can't see why we wanted one at CPT4 still . . . .my notes stated ... . . .well at 95'bgs in the CPT 4 area. . . . . " but I can't <br /> I figure out why w/o the x-sect. . <br /> be sure each well and each delineating sample point/location is on a x-section (Le : CPT-4). . . <br /> We'll review the wp, and comment if more is needed or OK as is. . <br /> thanks for your help . <br /> ff you have any notes why CPT4 was ok to investigate at the meeting but seems unneeded now? <br /> I From : Robert Marty [mailto : rmarty@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2 : 27 PM <br /> t To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> f Subject: CPT Nomellini <br /> Here are the GPT boring logs. <br /> C Robert E. Marty, R.E.A. I <br />'r Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br /> i Stockton + Santa Rosa + Monterey + Brea <br /> 1 -800-511-9300 <br /> miarty @)adv,geoenv.com <br /> www.advgeoenv.com <br /> This cmad1ax message is for the sole use of the intended recipicni(s) and may contain confidential and privileged <br /> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email/fax is prohibited. Ifyou are not the <br /> intended recipient, please contact the sender by emaiL'fax and destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original <br /> nessa.ge. <br /> 9/18/2007 <br />