Laserfiche WebLink
Message Page 3 of 3 <br /> Mike, <br /> Yes, the wording is very clear and understood; however, the GWsample from <br /> CPT-4 at 55-57 feet was ND for all CDCs. As a matter of fact, each GW <br /> sample (34 to 37, 55 to 57, 77 to 80 and 96 to 99) was ND for all CDCs. <br /> My question is simply what is the "contamination found in water sample <br /> collected between 55 and 57 feet bgs in CPT-4" referred to in your letter dated <br /> 27 July 2007. <br /> Now, CPT- 1 is another story. Seems the deep well should be near CPT- 1 <br /> instead of CPT-4 with reports of TPH-g, BTEX, TAME and 1 ,2-DCA at 96 to <br /> 99 feet bsg. <br /> Best Regards, <br /> Arthur Deicke <br /> Project Scientist <br /> Cell: (831 ) 402-5850 <br /> adeickc( uadvueocnv .com <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental , Inc. <br /> www.adveeoeiiv . com <br /> 837 Shaw Road 395 Del Monte Center, #111 <br />( Stockton , CA 95215 Monterey, CA 93940 <br /> i <br /> Ph: (209) 467-1006 Ph : (800) 511 -9300 <br /> Fax: (209) 467- 1118 Fax: (831 ) 394-5979 <br /> This tennilfFax i is for the slito use of the iniendell recipir i(.; ) and inav contem coilildieneil and ork ile_>ed intarilia6im. <br /> Ani aetto iled rc% luil . Ilse. di .:o <br /> I, rt illd .-trh, i >ntil h .: <br /> i � nal ' laxNpruL <br /> h" td. lf "iii are not [lie iendcd rcc' pnl <br /> e . <br /> please contact the sender byemei [ fax and dcsonv :ill paper and electronic copies of the ori6lell mess-a�e. <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto : MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10 : 17 AM <br /> To: adeicke@advgeoenv.com <br /> Cc: rmarty@advgeoenv.com <br /> Subject: Nomellini <br /> Art, <br /> I checked into your question regarding the area around CPT-4 and what EHD <br /> wants. <br /> I'm confused here, since our letter of July 27, 2007, page two identified a gw <br /> concern at 55' to 57' bgs in the CPT-4 area . The last paragraph on page one <br /> stated 'at least three additional deep monitirng wells , ". one of which , the "the <br /> third well is to be installed near CPT-4. . . " Seems pretty clear to me. <br /> Do you have an additional concern/depth at CPT-4 area? If so, support the <br /> need for it in the work plan and I'll review it and get back to you . <br /> 9/18/2007 <br />