Laserfiche WebLink
Message Page 2 of 2 <br /> Yes, the wording is very clear and understood; however, the GWsample from CPT4 at 55- <br /> 57 feet was ND for all CDCs. As a matter of fact, each GW sample (34 to 375 55 to 57, 77 <br /> to 80 and 96 to 99) was ND for all COCs. <br /> My question is simply what is the "contamination found in water sample collected between <br /> 55 and 57 feet bgs in CPT-4" referred to in your letter dated 27 July 2007 . <br /> Now, CPT- 1 is another story. Seems the deep well should be near CPT- 1 instead of CPT- <br /> 4 with reports of TPH-g, BTEC£, TAME and 1 ,2-DCA at 96 to 99 feet bsg. <br /> Best Regards, <br /> Arthur Deicke <br /> Project Scientist <br /> Cell : (831 ) 402-5850 <br /> adeichcct,.adNrgcocnv . com <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental , Inc. <br /> www. ad vgeoenv .com <br /> 837 Shaw Road 395 Del Monte Center, #111 <br /> Stockton , CA 95215 Monterey, CA 93940 <br /> Ph : (209) 467-1006 Ph: (800) 511 -9300 <br /> Fax: (209) 467-1118 Fax: (831 ) 394-5979 <br /> ThisemailTas nwsnee is for the sole use of intended mclplennst mill may conn <br /> contain conlidodal end pricilcecd Ineornndon. Anv unauthorized <br /> lvview� l ik l distnbution ot' lles uureiiPtsIl If I OU ele n,t the le W - ded iccil CoL plusc c , ntmct the �tndci by email4lax <br /> and dstr . , adl p; licr and electionic copies of the orifiblalmesag <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto: MInfurna@sjcehd .com] <br /> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10 : 17 AM <br /> To: adeicke@advgeoenv.com <br /> Cc: rmarty@advgeoenv.com <br /> Subject: Nomellini <br /> Art, <br /> I checked into your question regarding the area around CPT-4 and what EHD wants. <br /> I'm confused here, since our letter of July 27, 2007, page two identified a gw concern at 55' to <br /> 57' bgs in the CPT-4 area. The last paragraph on page one stated 'at least three additional <br /> deep monifirng wells . ". one of which , the "the third well is to be installed near CPT-4. .1 " <br /> Seems pretty clear to me. <br /> Do you have an additional concern/depth at CPT-4 area? If so, support the need for it in the <br /> work plan and I'll review it and get back to you . <br /> I <br /> 9/18/2007 <br />