Laserfiche WebLink
M gig" <br /> M <br /> 02 January 2007 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0121 <br /> Page 4 of 10 <br /> 3,306 hours. Extraction flow rates ranged from approximately38 cubic feetperminute (cfin) <br /> to73 cfin. Soil vapor extraction data is presented in Table A2. <br /> • Between 08 January and 26 January 2004, approximately 0.08 feet of free-phase floating <br /> petroleum product was encountered at well VW-1 on three separate occasions; VW- I was <br /> hand bailed on each occasion until petroleum product was not observed. Thereafter, free- <br /> phase petroleum product was not measured or observed at well VW- I on 07 and 27 April <br /> 2004. Hand bailing activities appears to have been effective in removing free-phase floating <br /> petroleum product at well VW- I . <br /> • The SVE unit operated for approximately 4,392 hours between 22 June and 22 December <br /> 2004, recovering a total of 382.6 lbs of TPH-g. Between 22 December 2004 and 04 May <br /> 2005, the SVE unit operated for approximately 3, 192 hours. Extraction flow rates ranged <br /> from 36 cubic feet per minute (cfu) to 52 cfin. The concentrations of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons detected in soil vapor samples collected at the SVE unit were considered to be <br /> acceptable for successful on-going SVE remediation. <br /> • 18 January, 16 February, 16 March, 13 April, and 04 May 2005 : TPH-g, BTEX and MTBE <br /> were not detected in the influent vapor sample. <br /> • Due to consistent non-detections of hydrocarbon constituents in influent air samples taken <br /> during the first and second quarters 2005, and as directed in an EHD letter dated 25 April <br /> 2005, AGE terminated operation of the SVE system on-site on 11 May 2005 . It was <br /> determined that the system had performed to maximum potential remediation; hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations had decreased beyond the level at which soil vapor extraction was effective. <br /> • Between February 1991 and December 2006, forty-one ground water monitoring/sampling <br /> events were performed at the site. During this time, a trend in hydrocarbon concentrations <br /> suggested increasing concentrations from the "core" area wells, and decreasing <br /> concentrations from the perimeter wells. <br /> HYDROGEOLOGIC UNITS <br /> Hydrogeologic or hydrostratigraphic units (HUs) are defined as a body of rock or sediment that has <br /> hydrogeologic characteristics (i.e. hydraulic conductivity, pore pressure, etc.) that make it distinct <br /> from surrounding bodies of rock or sediment (Sanders, 1998), or a part of a body of rock that forms <br /> a distinct hydrologic unit with respect to the flow of ground water (Maxey, 1964). A `flow unit' can <br /> be defined as a hydrogeologic unit and is characterized by significantly greater hydraulic <br /> conductivity values than overlying and underlying units; a flow unit is capable of serving as a <br /> preferred migration route, and could potentially allow migration of large contaminant masses over <br /> great distances in a dissolved phase. <br />