Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Burgin <br />The return to compliance and portions of the SPCC plan have been reviewed. The following violations require more <br />clarification. I have include suggestions of what can be done to come into compliance. <br />Violation 105 - Failure to properly close tanks when making a claim of permanently closed. <br />Provide a statement that the closed tank also meets the following requirements. <br />- remove all liquid and sludge from each containerand connecting line <br />-disconnect and blankoff all connecting lines and piping havefrom thetank <br />- close and lock all valves <br />Violation 609 - Plan failed to adequately contain procedures for reporting a discharge. <br />Thisviolation has been addressed sincethe correct numberforthe San Joaquin Envrionmental Health Department is <br />found in the SPCC plan but the numberforthe San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department provided in <br />Appendix A page A-2 is incorrect. The number is (209) 468-3420. <br />Violation 618 - Failed to keep records of procedures, inspections, or integrity tests for three years. <br />Provide statementthat assuresthe department that inspectionswill be conducted as perthe SPCC plan and the records <br />will be retained as required or provide copies of the inspection reportsforthe monthly and annual inspections. <br />Violation 711 - Failed to perform scheduled tank tests or inspections by appropriately qualified personnel. <br />The inspection report should state whether or not the tank is suitable for continued use, this is a requirement forthe <br />certified reports underthe SP -001 standard. <br />The following is not part of the violation, but the SPCC plan was amended and may be a violation during the next <br />inspection. <br />I noticed that the SPCC plan no longer references an industry standard. The previous version of the SPCC plan referenced <br />the STI SP -001 standard. It is a regulatory requirement that an industry standard be used to determine the appropriate <br />qualifications for personnel performing tests and inspections, the frequency and type of testing and inspections. If the <br />facility is to continue inspecting the tanks per the STI standard, it needs to state that in the SPCC plan, along with <br />deviations from the standard, if any. Looking at the SPCC Inspection checklists provided to the facility, the checklists may <br />not meet the requirements of the SP -001 standard. I have included the SP -001 standard checklists. As stated on the <br />checklists, locally developed checklists are acceptable as long as they are substantially equivalent (as applicable). <br />Inspections of multiple tanks may be captured on one form as long as the tanks are substantially the same. It seems like <br />the SPCC plan does not included an annual inspection form forthe tanks, assuming that the standard will continue to be <br />SP -001. The "frequent SPCC inspection" form may not meet all the requirements forthe most current SP -001 monthly <br />checklist.. <br />Feel free to contact me with any questions <br />FREE classes presented by NES Inc. are available to all San Joaquin County Hazardous Waste, Underground Storage Tank, <br />and Aboveground Petroleum Storage Facility Business Owners and Operators. List and schedule of classes can be found <br />here. <br />Thankyou, <br />Cesar Ruvalcaba <br />San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br />Environmental Health Specialist <br />