My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001105
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1045
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544231
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2019 4:10:09 PM
Creation date
3/6/2019 2:04:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001105
RECORD_ID
PR0544231
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0023968
FACILITY_NAME
NOMELLINI CONSTRUCTION CO
STREET_NUMBER
1045
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16323040
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1045 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> 09 March 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0121 <br /> , <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br /> , <br /> After the depth to ground water was measured, between 10 5 and 17 0 gallons of ground water(a <br />' minimum of three casing water volumes per well)were evacuated(purged) from monitoring wells <br /> MW-1 through MW-8 utilizing a Waterra Inertia pump and dedicated'tubing At the request of AGE <br /> to the EHD by telephone,up-gradient monitoring well MW-9 was not purged or sampled during this - <br /> monitoring event <br />' Temperature,pH,and conductivity were measured for stabilization at regular purge-volume Intervals <br /> using an Oakton water analyzer Field data and logs are Included in Appendix B Purged ground <br /> water was containerized in properly labeled, Department of Transportation (DOT)-approved <br /> 55-gallon drums and stored on-site in an area lacking general public access r <br /> f <br /> 2'2 2 Collection and Analysis of Ground Water Samples <br /> Pnor'to sampling, the depth to ground water was re-measured to ensure that a minimum 80% well <br /> volume recharge had been achieved Ground water samples were collected from wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-8 using a Waterra inertia pump and dedicated tubing The samples were transferred <br /> into, three 40-milliliter (ml) volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0 5 ml 18% <br /> hydrochloric acid solution as a sample preservative, and into one 1-liter amber bottle without <br /> preservative The samples were logged on a chain of custody form, stored in a chilled container,and <br />' transported to CAL for analysis The ground water samples were analyzed for <br /> • TPH-g in accordance with EPA Method 8015, <br /> BTEX and MTBE in accordance with EPA Method 8020, and <br /> • Fuel additives MTBE di-isopropyl ether(PIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether ETBE tertiary- <br /> amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary-butyl alcohol (TBA), 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB), and <br /> 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260 <br /> r <br /> 1' <br /> 3.4. ' FINDINGS <br /> The impact of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents to soil vapor samples was quantified by <br /> laboratory analytical data,the mass of TPH-g extracted by the SVE system was calculated from the <br /> flow rate and laboratory analytical'data Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were <br />' determined from field data collected on 19 July 2004, the contaminant impact to ground water was <br /> quantified by analysis of ground water samples <br /> i ` r <br /> i <br /> + , � Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> f <br /> v <br /> ., i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.