Laserfiche WebLink
• , S i <br /> 12 May 1995 <br /> AGE-NC-95-0121 <br /> ,Page 3 of 4 <br /> 3 2. COLLECTION OF GROUND WATER SAMPLE'S <br /> _ Ground water samples were collected from each well using new disposable bailers The samples were <br />' collected in 40-m1 EPA vials preserved with hydrochloric acid and one-liter amber bottles and were <br /> transported in a chilled container to ABC Laboratories, Pan-Ag Division (Pan-Ag) in Madera, <br />' California The samples were analyzed for TPH(gasoline and diesel)and BTE&X in accordance with <br /> EPA methods 8015m and 602, respectively <br /> 3 3. GROUND WATER DEPTH <br /> On 23 May 1995,the depths to ground water were measured relative to the top of the casing, using ' <br /> a Solinst water level meter, in all nine wells at the site Pressure was noted in several wells when the <br /> locking caps were removed Ground water was allowed to stabilize in these wells before <br />' measurements were collected The ground water elevations in'each well and hydraulic gradient were <br /> calculated by subtracting the depth to ground water from the'surveyed casing elevation (Table 1) A <br /> disposable bailer was used to deternune the apparent thickness of free product in MW-1 ` <br /> 4.0. FINDINGS <br /> , <br /> I <br /> 41 RELATIVE GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT k <br />' The ground water elevation in each well was calculated by subtracting the depth to water from the <br /> surveyed casing elevation(Table 1) Ground water elevation at the site ranges from -18 77 t 29 <br />' feet, indicating an average rise of 6 35 feet between December 1994 and May 1995 <br /> Ground water flow direction was determined to be northeast(Figure 3) A mounding effect was noted <br />' near the southwest corner of the property The ground water gradient was determined to be, <br /> approximately 0 0025 ft/ft This gradient is slightly more shallow than the gradient calculated in <br /> December 1994 No free product was observed in MW-I that would effect ground water depth <br /> measurements, only a sheen was observed <br /> A2 ANALYTICALaRESULrTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-as gasoline` was detected in samples from,MW-1 through MW-4, MW-6 and MW-7 at <br /> concentrations`from 1,600 pg/1(parts per billion ppb,MW-2)to 11,000 ppb (MW-1), TPH as diesel <br /> was detected in samples from MW-I through MW-6 and MW-9 at concentrations ranging from 72 <br /> ppb (MW-1) to 8,I00 ppb (MW-5) The laboratory report noted that the chromatograms from the <br />