Laserfiche WebLink
hydropunch sample taken from auger hole "B", directly beneath the <br />removed waste oil tank TPH as gasoline was below detection <br />limits in the water sample from auger hole "B" & also from MW -2 & <br />MW -3, see PLATE XXII-E for details <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />Based upon the results of all of the data collected to date, the <br />following conclusions appear to be valid <br />1 Except for the minor amounts of toluene, xylene, & TRPH <br />encountered in Auger holes "A"" & "C" at 6161" (refer to TABLE IX,) <br />soil contamination appears to be restricted to depths below 26" <br />in the eight soil borings placed on the property Groundwater <br />was encountered above 25" bgl during this work, which indicates <br />the soil contamination may be due to changes in water levels, and <br />not indigenous to the soils Some soil contamination remains in <br />the area where the septic tank system was removed <br />2 Laboratory analyzes of water samples from the four monitoring <br />wells, summarized on TABLE XI, revealed minor amounts of benzene <br />in MW -3 & MW -4, varying amounts of touluene in MW -1, MW -2, & <br />MW -4, and xylene in MW -1, MW -2, & MW -4 TPH as gasoline was only <br />detected in MW -1, and TRPH as diesel was measured only in MW -4 <br />These figures suggest that there are two sources of contamination <br />on the property, one associated with the removed diesel tanks, <br />and another in the area south or west of the shop building <br />3 Hydropunch water samples obtained from auger hole "A" <br />revealed very high levels of BTEX and TPH as gasoline, TRPH was <br />below detection limits Maps drawn of lines of equal concen- <br />trations of BTEX & TPH-G (PLATES XXII-A thru XXIII-E,) show the <br />anomalously high levels found in that water sample This data <br />supports the conclusion in paragraph 2 above, (more than one <br />source of contamination,) although without additional data, it is <br />not possible to clarify the problem <br />RECOMMENDATIONS. <br />After reviewing of all of the data obtained to date, the <br />following recommendations are made concerning this site <br />1 The four monitoring wells should be purged, sampled and <br />tested on a quarterly basis until sufficient data is collected to <br />determine what additional work is needed If possible, the <br />monitoring well placed in the southeast corner of the property by <br />Nomellini Construction Co should be included in this program <br />This should allow better definition of the extent of groundwater <br />14 <br />