Laserfiche WebLink
0I • <br /> JM Equipment page 2 <br /> 1245 W. Charter Way, Stockton. <br /> Report comment le er <br /> Observation 1: (co tinued) <br /> Based on the table on page 6, SJCEHD calculates that a minimum of 86 gallons <br /> of liquid was injected into MW-9. If the soil has 50% effective porosity, GTI's <br /> point would be well taken, however, clayey soil typically has 4-8% effective <br /> porosity - even wit a total porosity of 50%. Using a 5% effective porosity, the <br /> volume of water inj cted could reach and affect GP-1 , especially if application of <br /> pressure to drive tV e injectant into the aquifer overwhelmed the hydraulic <br /> conductivity of the oil and created temporary pathways through the clayey soil <br /> by rupturing the cle yey soil fabric. <br /> Also, GTI interpret the decline of hydrocarbon concentrations in MW-9 to be due <br /> to oxidant being inj acted into the well, which at first glance would seem to be the <br /> causative factor. F owever, SJCEHD notes that a similar decline of hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations occirred during the summer and fall of 2001, which cannot be <br /> attributed to injection of oxidant. SJCEHD questions how to demonstrate that the <br /> recent decline is not caused by or greatly influenced by the same factors <br /> operating in 2001? <br /> Observation 2: Increased oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) in MW-1 and <br /> GP-1, interpreted to indicate a 1-foot radius of influence for the injectant. <br /> SJCEHD believes that the oxidants were forced from MW-9 to GPA through <br /> temporary rupture in the soil fabric caused by applied pressure overwhelming <br /> the clayey soil's hydraulic conductivity, bypassing the major portion of impacted <br /> water between thE wells and delivering the oxidants directly to GP-1. This was <br /> demonstrated by t ie breakthrough at 8 or 10 psi that forced the H2O2 solution up <br /> GPA to the surface. SJCEHD believes it quite possible that the observed ORP <br /> effect in GPA wa more due to direct migration through temporary ruptures in <br /> the clayey soil tha to migration uniformly through the column of soil adjacent to <br /> MWA's screened section. The implication is that most of the impacted <br /> groundwater in the clayey soil would be bypassed and mostly groundwater <br /> immediately adjacent to the walls of the temporary rupture in the clayey soil and <br /> to the well casings would be addressed by the oxidants. <br /> GTI hypothesizes that the oxidants migrated along fractures in the clayey soil <br /> induced during dr Iling, into GPA and recommends investigating the applicability <br /> of using fracture t chnology to enhance the permeability of the soil. As fully <br /> hydrated clay has high cohesiveness but little rigidity or shear strength, SJCEHD <br /> questions whether or not fractures can be maintained in a saturated clay or <br /> clayey soil. Please provide documentation of the successful application of <br /> fracturing in saturated clay and/or clayey soil to SJCEHD for further evaluation of <br /> the recommenda ion. <br />