My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001010
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1245
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544236
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2019 8:02:44 PM
Creation date
3/6/2019 4:03:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001010
RECORD_ID
PR0544236
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0024238
FACILITY_NAME
JM EQUIPMENT COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
1245
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16323034
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1245 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geologi al Technia Inc Page 5 <br /> 1"Quarter 2003 Groundwater Monitonng Report <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> May 15,2003 <br /> ' • Dee well <br /> Deep MW-109 continues to intermittently contain trace amounts of (at or dust <br /> ' above the laboratory reporting limits) BTEX contamination For the second consecutive <br /> event the well contained 0 4 ug/l xylene The reduction in contaminant concentrations <br /> from the first sampling event on June 1, 2001 is noted, however sufficient monitoring <br /> has been performed to conclude that it is probably a drilling artifact or the bottom of the <br /> groundwater plume <br /> • Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between groundwater elevation and TPH-G <br /> concentrations in well MW-9 (located in the core of the plume) An inverse trend was <br /> consistent for the first four monitoring events, but since the March 2001 event the <br /> relationship has been predominantly parallel The March event recorded a return to an <br /> ' inverse relationship between the two parameters <br /> • Figure 5 illustrates the relationship between groundwater elevation and TPH-G <br /> concentrations in well MW-5 (located up/cross gradient of the core of the plume) An <br /> inverse trend was consistent for the first four monitoring events, but since the March <br /> 2001 event the relationship has been predominantly parallel The March event recorded <br /> a return to an inverse relationship between the two parameters <br /> • Trend lines added to the data in Figures 4 & 5 show that as the groundwater elevation <br /> has lowered since 1999 that the concentration of TPH-G has increased This suggests <br /> that concentration is directly related to groundwater level at the site <br /> o Figure b indicates an inconsistent relationship between groundwater elevation and <br /> ' contaminant concentrations in well MW-6 No data is included for the December 2002 <br /> event due to the well's inaccessibility <br /> o The groundwater gradient is relatively flat and the direction of groundwater flow has <br /> vaned during the course of the investigation <br /> © Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) was measured (Table 4) and the results suggest <br /> that with the exception of MW-7, all of the wells sampled are either in the core of the <br /> contamination plume or are immediately down gradient from the plume and within the <br /> halo of reaction depleted water caused by biodegradation of the contaminants <br /> Dissolved oxygen concentrations do not routinely corroborate with the ORP values, <br /> suggesting that there may be a problem with the DO measurements <br /> • Figure 7 is a contour map indicating the TPH-G concentrations on March 18, 2003 The _ <br /> groundwater plume is localized in the vicinity of the former UST excavation The bulls- <br /> eye pattern to the TPH-G contour map in Figure 7 shows that the center of the plume has <br /> not moved from its source and suggests that contaminant migration may be occurring <br /> primarily by diffusion with a slight influence by advection <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.