My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001033
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHARTER
>
1245
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544236
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0001033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2019 7:57:37 PM
Creation date
3/6/2019 4:13:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001033
RECORD_ID
PR0544236
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0024238
FACILITY_NAME
JM EQUIPMENT COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
1245
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
CHARTER
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16323034
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1245 W CHARTER WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geo(orcal?echnics inc Page 2 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> November 6, 2000 <br /> ' A groundwater gradient was calculated for the event and found to be flowing N35°E at 0 003 <br /> ft/ft Gradient direction for the monitoring event is shown in Figure 2 The groundwater <br /> ' elevation data is summarized in Table 1, Appendix A <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> ' On September 26, 2000, Don Light of Del-Tech mobilized to the site to conduct groundwater <br /> monitoring of the eight existing monitoring wells <br />' Before sampling was attempted the wells were sounded for depth to water and then a clear <br /> disposable bailer was used to determine if floating product was present The wells were <br />' purged of at least three well volumes of stagnant water using a dedicated Waterra check-ball <br /> assembly and %" tubing Purging continued until the temperature, conductivity, and pH of <br /> the groundwater stabilized (<10% variation between three readings), indicating that <br /> formation water representative of aquifer conditions was entering the wells These water <br /> quality parameters were measured at intervals of each well volume purged <br /> Once purging was complete, a water sample was collected from the Waterra tube Care was <br /> taken to minimize sample agitation Once the sample container was filled and capped, the <br /> bottle was inverted, tapped, and checked for headspace bubbles The sample container was <br /> identified and labeled with a unique designation, inserted into a foam holder and placed in an <br /> ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br />' All non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a hot water washer and <br /> detergent before and between uses Disposable gloves were used by the technician to collect <br />' all samples and were changed with each sample collection <br /> A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected, accompanied the samples from <br /> field to laboratory, thereby providing a means to track their movement and insure their <br /> integrity <br /> All water purged from each monitoring well and not used as a sample was placed in a 55 <br /> gallon DOT approved container These drums were properly labeled and will be stored on _ <br />' site until their proper disposition can be arranged <br /> Groundwater monitoring field logs are included in Appendix C <br />' 1.3 Laboratory Analyses <br /> The groundwater samples collected on September 26, 2000 were delivered to Sherwood Lab <br /> 0 <br /> (Department of Health Services Certification No 1400), of Hilmar, California, for analysis <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.