Laserfiche WebLink
CMIO fral Ted vacs Inc Page 2 <br /> g � <br /> 4�'Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monxtonng Report <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> February 22,2005 <br /> on the pilot test was submitted to SJC EHD for review in November 2004 They have since <br /> commented on the field work and requested that a site conceptual model (SCM) be submitted <br /> prior to proposing further corrective action <br /> Since there is uncertainty regarding the soil profile at the site due to the 5-foot sampling <br />' interval, GTI will propose performing several continuous core borings The data generated <br /> by this effort will then be used to formulate a site conceptual model desired by SJC EHD <br /> After the site conceptual model issue is resolved GTI will propose further corrective action <br /> work <br />' 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 1.1 Hydrogeology of Site <br />' The geology of the site is predominately clays and sandy clays with lesser amounts of inter <br />' bedded silts and sands The average groundwater elevation was —1173 feet below msl on <br /> December 29, 2004, which corresponds to approximately 15 5 feet below grade surface (bgs) <br /> This average elevation represents an increase of 188 feet since the August 25, 2004 <br /> monitoring event Groundwater gradient for this monitoring event was 0 003 ft/ft flowing to <br /> the N58°E direction This site consistently exhibits a flat groundwater gradient <br />' The gradient direction for the August monitoring event is shown in Figure 2, and the <br /> historical groundwater directions and gradients are shown in Figure 3, Groundwater Gradient <br /> Rose Diagram The groundwater elevation data are summarized in Table 1, Appendix A <br />' Table 5 provides a summary of monitoring well construction <br /> The groundwater gradient is relatively flat and the direction of groundwater flow has varied <br />' during the course of the investigation As evident in Figure 3, groundwater exhibited a strong <br /> bifurcated flow regime in 2000, trending predominantly to the southwest or north-northeast at <br /> approximately 180-degree direction reversal Since the installation of wells MW-7 and MW- <br /> 10 in May 2001, the direction has been predominantly to the northeast The site is quite close <br /> to the San Joaquin River and tidal fluctuations may contribute to some of the observed <br /> changes in groundwater direction <br />' Vertical Groundwater Gradients <br />' Under vertical groundwater flow conditions, the water level in a monitoring well is a function <br /> of the length of the well screen and its depth or vertical position in the aquifer. As with <br /> horizontal flow conditions,the diameter of the well or piezometer is immaterial <br /> r <br />