Laserfiche WebLink
Cleo gkalTec/urles lac Page 3 <br /> 16 TdQuarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 507 2 <br /> November 4, 2004 <br /> ' Figure 2 shows the location of the well cluster used for calculating the vertical groundwater <br /> gradient in this report, MW-9 and MW-109 Table 1 shows Summary of Water Level and <br /> ' Gradients Slope and Bearing, and Table 2 shows the calculated vertical gradients The <br /> information used in the calculations is shown below <br /> ' Vertical gradient calculation formulas are as follows <br /> ® Vertical correction for gradient [(gw gradient slope) x (distance) = vertical correction] <br /> • Vertical head [(head of deep well) - (head of shallow +correction) =vertical head] <br /> ' ® Vertical gradient [(vertical head)/ (vertical distance) =vertical gradient] <br /> For the August 2004 monitoring event a vertical gradient was calculated for the MW-9/MW- <br /> 109 pair The vertical gradient was negative (a downward direction) at 0 0056 ft/ft. <br /> ' 1.2 Groundwater Sampling Procedure <br /> On August 25, 2004, Don Light of Del-Tech mobilized to the site to conduct groundwater <br /> ' monitoring of the site's eleven monitoring wells Before sampling was attempted, the wells <br /> were sounded for depth to water and then a clear disposable bailer was used to determine if <br /> floating product was present No free product was noted for this event The wells were <br /> purged of at least three well volumes of stagnant water using a dedicated Waterra check-ball <br /> assembly and 1/z inch tubing or centrifugal pump Purging continued until the temperature, <br /> conductivity, and pH of the groundwater stabilized (<10% variation in three consecutive <br />' readings), indicating that formation water representative of aquifer conditions was entering <br /> the wells These water quality parameters were measured at intervals of each well volume <br /> purged <br />' Once purging was complete, a water sample was collected from the Waterra tube Care was <br /> taken to minimize sample agitation Once the sample container was filled and capped, the <br /> bottle was inverted, tapped and checked for headspace bubbles The sample container was <br /> identified and labeled with a unique designation, inserted into a foam holder and placed into <br /> an ice chest cooled to 4°C for transport to the laboratory <br />' All non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a hot water washer and <br /> detergent before and between uses Disposable gloves were used by the technician to collect <br />' all samples and were changed with each sample collection <br /> A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected, accompanied the samples from <br />' field to laboratory, thereby providing a means to track the movement of and insure the <br /> integrity of the samples <br />' All water purged from each monitoring well and not used as a sample was placed in a 55 <br /> gallon DOT approved container These drums were properly labeled and will be stored on <br /> site until their proper disposition can be arranged <br />