COMPLIANCE INFO 2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

S WRCB,January 2002 Page of 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sums ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Net Tested ❑ Test Method Developed By: ❑Sump Manufacturer ❑Industry Standard ,professional Engineer ❑Other(Spec) / ` Test Method Used: ❑Pressure ❑Vacuumdrostatic ❑Other(Spec) ;Q FCy Test Equipment Used: Crt jdw et I Le L C4,�,,o,,, t r C.cr I Equipment Resolution: o x s" p Fill Sump# ,I. Fill Sump# %� Fill Sum # Sump Diameter: �a �r -Sump Depth: 9y+ ++ R Jar 1 Height from Tank Top to Top of -Highest Piping Penetration: \ Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: a 2 21 11 Condition of sump prior to testing: r'LA Portion of Sump Tested A_ r l ,,,.P l IV' r z5 fzz c� 23' Sump Material: 1!lx rq a 5 5 1= he-ver l ry s 1' tik rq 14 s S Wait time betwe pj4n / pressure/vacuu d water� startin test: (p r-� an S I/a r,'t vwc -e S 1 r t'r uut-1 e, S { Test Start Time: Initial Reading (RI): rry Test End Time: 3 ' 5-5- Final 5Final Readin (RF): a,,e4- yGtr ',-v��r<� K/7 ti Test Duration: 34.rtr,..y, „tel 3 o r,-z.. 'r”; ?o Change in Reading RF-Rt : etl Q C,.Ge t-v&6 I...•rrt �avG�d �. Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: 13 o r•4,_ e ve Gr o% t t � t.s„ f Test Result: Pass ❑Fail Pass ❑Fail 'Pass ❑Fail E� Pass ❑tail Is there a sensor in the sump? es ❑No Oyes ❑No �Yes ❑No N5 Yes ❑ o Does the sensor alarm when Yes ❑No ❑NA either product or water is les ❑No ❑NA ❑No ❑NA JYes ❑No NA detected? b Was sensor removed for testing? P Yes ❑No ❑NA es ❑No ❑NATes ❑No ❑NA t 0 Yes ❑No `NA Was sensor properly replaced and 7-Yes ❑No ❑NA Yes ❑No ❑NA �Q'Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑14A verified functional after testing? t Comments—(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended folloiv-up for failed tests)