COMPLIANCE INFO 2008 - 2015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SWRCB, January 2002 8. FILL RISER CONTAINMF,NT STTMP TF.STlNG Page 7 of Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sums ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer ❑ Indust-- Standard ofessional Engineer ❑ Other (Spec) ' Test Method Used: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum �,AIydrostatic ❑ Other (Specie) �! Test Equipment Used: 6? Idwe (f L..-,,4 Ig i c et Equipment Resolution: , O °;,;, .„ti, • :T., Fill Sump # Fill Sum # a Fill Sump # Fill Sump # Sump Diameter: q,�L-`' tom” Sump Depth: (,,, �" „ •� Height from Tank Top to Top of Highest Piping Penetration: v19 to, 2-3 Height from Tank Top to Lowest Electrical Penetration: a Condition of sump prior to testing: 'PY p y j Portion of Sump Tested Sump Material: ', ,�.v r,:5 Pti 1WVey) &SS Vi 6, a S Wait time betwee mg pressure/vacuuniwaterAnd starting test: i eve a -,Gr , /d /�-i •� rd� :� S /Q 5 Test Start Time: O 2.' 3 5 - Initial Initial Readin (R,): fL C &,l fl -5 -i-C O C (P Test End Time: / D D Final Reading (RF): ry4- C"to Test Duration: d I ,,r i,G -e .7 w ws Change in Reading (RF-Ri): N Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: r Test Result: XPass ❑ Fail XPass ❑ Fail Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pas ❑ Fail Is there a sensor in the sump?es ❑ No Yes EI Yes ElNo ElY s V No Does the sensor alarm when either product or water is detected? Yes ❑ No ❑ NAY es ❑ No 11 NA / Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Y ❑ No\NA Was sensor removed for testing? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA es ❑ No ❑ NA es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ es ❑ No ❑ A Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA � Yes El ❑ NA Yes El No ❑ NA Yes ❑ No ❑ N Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)