My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2007 - 2009
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CALIFORNIA
>
3212
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231035
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2007 - 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2022 4:54:02 PM
Creation date
3/27/2019 1:36:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2007 - 2009
RECORD_ID
PR0231035
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0006773
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO 02186
STREET_NUMBER
3212
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
CALIFORNIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12532001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3212 N CALIFORNIA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19255517888 Main Fax <br />Monitoring System Certification <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: <br />Complete the following checklist: <br />GETTLER RYAN INC <br />+^ '0:49 p.m. 01-11-2007 <br />0) -6 I I ,:� / <br />Yes <br />I ❑ No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />)ryes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />❑ Yes <br />A No* <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br />not interfere with their proper operation? <br />Yes <br />❑ No* <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e g. modem) <br />q _NIA <br />operational? <br />Yes <br />❑ No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shirt down if the piping secondary containment <br />❑ N/A <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) �Oumpfl rench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor fadweJdisconnectionl Yes; ❑ No. <br />Cl Yes <br />❑ No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />�N/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill point(s) and operating y? If so, at what percent of toric capacity does the alarm trigged % <br />es* <br />❑ No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, ide t specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below, <br />❑ Yes* <br />o <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all d w apply) <br />❑ Product; ❑ Warier. If yes, dwcribe causes in Section E, below. <br />Yes <br />❑ NO <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per mamfacpmr's specifications? <br />' In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected <br />E. Comments: In C7 / / <br />/ �v �b i .� C J'c�.�.-..� ,SC �S !✓ ^r- C�.� �M , f/ � � Z a ui fry <br />f,�.-Acj all /5 <br />(�� �� 1 ✓ /� i <br />"e <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.